ArticleGynakologische endokrinologie2021
[COVID-19 from the perspective of a gynecological endocrinologist].
Article in Gynakologische endokrinologie, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Virologists' Sex- and Gender-Based Medical Knowledge of COVID-19 Affects Quality of Students' Education.Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.) · 2023Article
- From Menopause to Neurodegeneration-Molecular Basis and Potential Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The infectious respiratory disease coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) shows striking differences in its course and severity depending on the gender of affected patients. The incidence in women is higher than in men, whereas severe forms of the disease are significantly more common in men as well as the mortality; however, premenopausal and postmenopausal women again present a dimorphism in the course depending on hormonal status. Premenopausal women have lower rates of hospitalization and need respiratory support less often. Postmenopausal women who receive hormone replacement therapy seem to benefit from this intervention. The results of basic research in a murine model show that in the case of influenza the female sex steroids have a positive effect on the course of inflammation and in the case of the SARS-CoV‑2 virus, reduce the susceptibility to the virus, while androgens result in an increase in the infection rate. This is also the case in patients with polycystic ovarian disease syndrome (PCOD). The first results of a treatment study with progesterone, albeit with small numbers of patients, indicate that such a treatment with this sex steroid can have a positive effect on the course of the disease in affected men; however, complications after vaccination against COVID-19 show a clear gender difference, with an increased relative risk for younger women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.