Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34335000›Full record

ArticleJournal of child and family studies2021

Beyond 16 Sessions: Extending Manualized Treatment of Anxious Youth.

Elana R Kagan, Hannah E Frank, Mark J Knepley, Philip C Kendall

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of child and family studies, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elana R KaganTemple University.
Hannah E FrankTemple University.
Mark J KnepleyTemple University.
Philip C KendallTemple University.

Funding

RESEARCH TRAINING IN CHILD MENTAL HEALTHT32MH019927 · NIMH · RHODE ISLAND HOSPITAL (PROVIDENCE, RI) · PI Kristen G Benito, Anthony Spirito · 1994 to 2026
$7.8M
Dissemination of Exposure-Based Treatment for Anxiety: Experiential Training for Community TherapistsF31MH112211 · NIMH · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI FRANK, HANNAH ELIZABETH · 2017 to 2018
$66k
NIMH NIH HHS F31 MH112211NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH019927
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is well established as an efficacious treatment for anxious youth, yet a number of youth remain symptomatic after the 10-16 sessions of treatment stipulated by most CBT treatment manuals. While a significant minority do not respond, no study has examined the frequency and impact of additional therapy sessions. This study examined youth receiving outpatient therapy at an anxiety clinic who were offered the option to continue treatment after completing 16 sessions of manual-based CBT. Fifty-nine percent of participants chose to continue treatment, with an average of approximately 20 total sessions across participants. Therapist ratings demonstrated a significant overall improvement between session 16 and the final session. No pre-treatment measure of symptom severity differed between those who extended treatment and those who ended at session 16. Parent-rated anxiety differed between groups at session 16, as did the length of time between the pre-treatment assessment and week 16 assessments. Findings indicate that extending treatment is not uncommon, is typically limited to several additional sessions, and is associated with an increase in treatment gains. Current results suggest that two factors at session 16, parental perceptions of anxiety and time to complete 16 sessions, are influential and may be central to the decision to continue treatment past this point. Clinical implications and future directions are discussed.

Indexed as

adolescentsanxietychildrencognitive behavioral therapytreatment outcome

Identifiers

PMID34335000
PMCPMC8317605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.