Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34334892›Full record

ArticleMedical journal, Armed Forces India2021

COVISHIELD (AZD1222) VaccINe effectiveness among healthcare and frontline Workers of INdian Armed Forces: Interim results of VIN-WIN cohort study.

Subhadeep Ghosh, Subramanian Shankar, Kaustuv Chatterjee, Kaushik Chatterjee, Arun Kumar Yadav, Kapil Pandya, Vani Suryam, Sunil Agrawal, Sougat Ray, Vivek Phutane and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical journal, Armed Forces India, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Cutting edge medical research.Medical journal, Armed Forces India · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Subhadeep GhoshCol AFMS (Health), O/o DGAFMS, New Delhi, India.
Subramanian ShankarConsultant (Medicine & Clinical Immunology), Air Cmde AFMS (P&T), O/o DGAFMS, New Delhi, India.
Kaustuv ChatterjeeOfficer-in-Charge, School of Medical Assistants, INHS Asvini, Mumbai, India.
Kaushik ChatterjeeProfessor & Head, Department of Psychiatry, Armed Forces Medical College, Pune, India.
Arun Kumar YadavAssociate Professor, Department of Community Medicine, Armed Forces Medical College, Pune, India.
Kapil PandyaAAG AFMS (Health), O/o DGAFMS, New Delhi, India.
Vani SuryamCol Medical (Health), O/o DGMS (Army), AG's Branch, IHQ of MOD, New Delhi, India.
Sunil AgrawalGp Capt MS (Health) & Senior Advisor (Community Medicine), Air HQ, O/o DGMS (Air), R K Puram, New Delhi, India.
Sougat RayCapt (MS), Health, IHQ of MoD (Navy), New Delhi, India.
Vivek PhutaneJDMS (ESM), Classified Specialist (Community Medicine), O/o DGMS (Navy), New Delhi, India.
Rajat DattaDirector General Armed Forces Medical Services, O/o DGAFMS, Ministry of Defence, 'M' Block, New Delhi, India.
Armed Forces Medical College · INIndian Navy · INIndian Air Force · INIndian Army · ININHS Asvini · INMinistry of Defence · INVoluntary Health Association of Goa · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOn 16 Jan 2021, India launched its immunization program against COVID-19. Among the first recipients were 1.59 million Health Care Workers (HCWs) and Frontline Workers (FLWs) of the Indian Armed Forces, who were administered COVISHIELD (Astra Zeneca). We present an interim analysis of vaccine effectiveness (VE) estimates till 30 May 2021.

methodsThe VIN-WIN cohort study was carried out on anonymized data of HCWs and FLWs of Indian Armed Forces. The existing surveillance system, enhanced for COVID-19 monitoring, was sourced for data. The cohort transitioned from Unvaccinated (UV) to Partially Vaccinated (PV) to Fully Vaccinated (FV), serving as its own internal comparison. Outcomes studied in the three groups were breakthrough infections and COVID related deaths. Incidence Rate Ratio (IRR) was used to compare outcomes among the three groups to estimate VE.

resultsData of 1,595,630 individuals (mean age 27.6 years; 99% male) over 135 days was analysed. Till 30 May 21, 95.4% and 82.2% were partially and fully vaccinated. The UV, PV and FV compartments comprised 106.6, 46.7 and 58.7 million person-days respectively. The number of breakthrough cases in the UV, PV and FV groups were 10061, 1159 and 2512; while the deaths were 37, 16 and 7 respectively. Corrected VE was 91.8-94.9% against infections.

conclusionInterim results of the VIN-WIN cohort study of 1.59 million HCWs and FLWs of Indian Armed Forces showed a ∼93% reduction in COVID-19 breakthrough infections with COVISHIELD vaccination.

Indexed as

Breakthrough infectionsCovid-19COVISHIELDVaccine effectivenessVIN-WIN cohort

Identifiers

PMID34334892
PMCPMC8313084
OpenAlexW3186748862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.