ArticleJournal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis2022
Statin Therapy in HIGH-Risk Individuals with NORMal Coronary Arteries: The HIGH-NORM Study.
Article in Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- The role of cardiac imaging in the post-ISCHEMIA world.The British journal of radiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsMismatches between the risk status of a patient and coronary imaging data can lead to conflicting strategies to prevent a cardiovascular event. We evaluated whether statin use was associated with cardiovascular benefit in high-risk individuals whose coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) results showed normal coronary arteries.
methodsAmong asymptomatic individuals whose CCTA showed normal or near normal coronary arteries, 3,389 persons with high- or very-high-risk status were included in this retrospective study. After 1:2 propensity score matching, 906 individuals (302 new statin users and 604 controls; mean age 61 years; male 58%) were analysed. The primary outcome variable was major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) that consisted of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, coronary revascularisation, and nonfatal ischemic stroke.
resultsAt a median follow-up of 5.8 years, 20 statin users and 17 controls (7.4 and 5.6 events/1,000 person-year, respectively; hazard ratio [HR) 1.04; p=0.92) experienced MACCE. Kaplan-Meier curves showed similar MACCE rates in both groups (p=0.91). In separate analyses for persons with normal (p=0.29) or near normal coronary arteries (p=0.67), MACCE rates did not differ between the groups. Age (HR 1.04; p=0.044), male sex (HR 3.06, p=0.018), and smoking (HR 2.87, p=0.019) were independently associated with MACCEs. In subgroup analyses, no significant factors affected the relationship between statin use and MACCEs.
conclusionsStatin use was not associated with cardiovascular risk reduction in high-risk persons with normal or near normal coronary arteries. More individualised lipid-lowering therapy may benefit this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.