Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34334104›Full record

ReviewBioengineered2021

Recovery of resources from industrial wastewater employing electrochemical technologies: status, advancements and perspectives.

Viralkunvar Devda, Kashika Chaudhary, Sunita Varjani, Bhawana Pathak, Anil Kumar Patel, Reeta Rani Singhania, Mohammad J Taherzadeh, Huu Hao Ngo, Jonathan W C Wong, Wenshan Guo and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineered, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. From Printed Devices to Vertically Stacked, 3D Flexible Hybrid Systems.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Viralkunvar DevdaParyavaran Bhavan, Gujarat Pollution Control Board, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India.
Kashika ChaudharyParyavaran Bhavan, Gujarat Pollution Control Board, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India.
Sunita VarjaniParyavaran Bhavan, Gujarat Pollution Control Board, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India.ORCID 0000-0001-6966-7768
Bhawana PathakSchool of Environment and Sustainable Development, Central University of Gujarat, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India.
Anil Kumar PatelDepartment of Marine Environmental Engineering, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan.
Reeta Rani SinghaniaDepartment of Marine Environmental Engineering, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan.
Mohammad J TaherzadehSwedish Centre for Resource Recovery, University of Borås, Borås, Sweden.
Huu Hao NgoCentre for Technology in Water and Wastewater, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Jonathan W C WongInstitute of Bioresource and Agriculture and Department of Biology, Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong, HKSAR.
Wenshan GuoCentre for Technology in Water and Wastewater, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Preeti ChaturvediEnvironmental Toxicology Group, Aquatic Toxicology Laboratory, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research-Indian Institute of Toxicology Research (CSIR-IITR), Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the last two decades, water use has increased at twice the rate of population growth. The freshwater resources are getting polluted by contaminants like heavy metals, pesticides, hydrocarbons, organic waste, pathogens, fertilizers, and emerging pollutants. Globally more than 80% of the wastewater is released into the environment without proper treatment. Rapid industrialization has a dramatic effect on developing countries leading to significant losses to economic and health well-being in terms of toxicological impacts on humans and the environment through air, water, and soil pollution. This article provides an overview of physical, chemical, and biological processes to remove wastewater contaminants. A physical and/or chemical technique alone appears ineffective for recovering useful resources from wastewater containing complex components. There is a requirement for more processes or processes combined with membrane and biological processes to enhance operational efficiency and quality. More processes or those that are combined with biological and membrane-based processes are required to enhance operational efficiencies and quality. This paper intends to provide an exhaustive review of electrochemical technologies including microbial electrochemical technologies. It provides comprehensive information for the recovery of metals, nutrients, sulfur, hydrogen, and heat from industrial effluents. This article aims to give detailed information into the advancements in electrochemical processes to energy use, improve restoration performance, and achieve commercialization. It also covers bottlenecks and perspectives of this research area.

Indexed as

Electrochemical TechniquesEnvironmental Restoration and RemediationHumansIndustrial WasteWastewaterWater Pollutants, ChemicalIndustrial WasteWastewaterWater Pollutants, Chemicalbiological treatmenteffluentelectrochemical technologyhealth hazardsIndustrial wastewaterresources

Identifiers

PMID34334104
PMCPMC8806852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.