Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34334023›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences2021

Life cycle assessment (LCA): informing the development of a sustainable circular bioeconomy?

Eva Sevigné-Itoiz, Onesmus Mwabonje, Calliope Panoutsou, Jeremy Woods

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07171853 (The Carbon Footprint Study of Colonoscopy for Colorectal Cancer Screening and Various Techniques of Colonic Polypectomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07171853 completednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

The Carbon Footprint Study of Colonoscopy for Colorectal Cancer Screening and Various Techniques of Colonic Polypectomy

TypeobservationalSponsorKing Chulalongkorn Memorial HospitalRan2025 to 2026Enrolled362ConditionsColonoscopy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Valorization of Mushroom Residues for Functional Food Packaging.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eva Sevigné-ItoizCentre for Environmental Policy (CEP), Imperial College London, (ICL), 18-19 Princess Garden, South Kensington, London SW7 1NE, UK.
Onesmus MwabonjeCentre for Environmental Policy (CEP), Imperial College London, (ICL), 18-19 Princess Garden, South Kensington, London SW7 1NE, UK.
Calliope PanoutsouCentre for Environmental Policy (CEP), Imperial College London, (ICL), 18-19 Princess Garden, South Kensington, London SW7 1NE, UK.
Jeremy WoodsCentre for Environmental Policy (CEP), Imperial College London, (ICL), 18-19 Princess Garden, South Kensington, London SW7 1NE, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of life cycle assessment (LCA) in informing the development of a sustainable and circular bioeconomy is discussed. We analyse the critical challenges remaining in using LCA and propose improvements needed to resolve future development challenges. Biobased systems are often complex combinations of technologies and practices that are geographically dispersed over long distances and with heterogeneous and uncertain sets of indicators and impacts. Recent studies have provided methodological suggestions on how LCA can be improved for evaluating the sustainability of biobased systems with a new focus on emerging systems, helping to identify environmental and social opportunities prior to large R&D investments. However, accessing economies of scale and improved conversion efficiencies while maintaining compatibility across broad ranges of sustainability indicators and public acceptability remain key challenges for the bioeconomy. LCA can inform, but not by itself resolve this complex dimension of sustainability. Future policy interventions that aim to promote the bioeconomy and support strategic value chains will benefit from the systematic use of LCA. However, the LCA community needs to develop the mechanisms and tools needed to generate agreement and coordinate the standards and incentives that will underpin a successful biobased transition. Systematic stakeholder engagement and the use of multidisciplinary analysis in combination with LCA are essential components of emergent LCA methods. This article is part of the theme issue 'Bio-derived and bioinspired sustainable advanced materials for emerging technologies (part 1)'.

Indexed as

Life Cycle StagesPolicyAnimalsbiobased systemsbiomass value chaincircular bioeconomyLCAlife cycle assessmentstakeholder engagement

Identifiers

PMID34334023
PMCPMC8326828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.