ReviewClinical and molecular hepatology2022
Current knowledge about biomarkers of acute kidney injury in liver cirrhosis.
Review in Clinical and molecular hepatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- The efficacy of novel biomarkers for the early detection and management of acute kidney injury: A systematic review.PloS one · 2025Pooled it
- Construction of an activatable ratiometric fluorescent nanoprobe for HClO detection and imaging in acute kidney injury models.RSC advances · 2026Article
- Role of Renal Biomarkers in Sarcopenia or Frailty in Patients With Liver Cirrhosis.Journal of Korean medical science · 2026Article
- KASL clinical practice guidelines for liver cirrhosis: Ascites and related complications 2026.Clinical and molecular hepatology · 2026Article
- The Value of T1 and T2 Mapping in Diagnosing Chronic Liver Disease-related Kidney Injury and Monitoring the Outcome of Stem Cell Therapy: An Animal Experimental Study.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2026Article
- Association between the C-reactive protein-triglyceride-glucose index (CTI) and the risk of acute kidney injury in critically ill patients with cirrhosis.BMC nephrology · 2025Article
- Nationwide analysis of renal outcomes in chronic hepatitis B patients treated with Tenofovir Alafenamide vs. Entecavir.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Acute Kidney Injury in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis: From Past to Present Definition and Diagnosis.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Understanding acute kidney injury in cirrhosis: Current perspective.World journal of hepatology · 2025Review
- Can Novel Biomarkers Effectively Predict Acute Kidney Injury in Liver or Kidney Transplant Recipients?International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- VWF/ADAMTS13 Ratio as a Potential Predictive Biomarker for Acute Kidney Injury Onset in Cirrhosis.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2024Article
- Hepatorenal syndrome: Current concepts and future perspectives.Clinical and molecular hepatology · 2023Review
- Urinary N-Acetyl-Beta-D-Glucosaminidase levels predict immunoglobulin a nephropathy remission status.BMC nephrology · 2023Article
- Acute kidney injury in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure: clinical significance and management.Kidney research and clinical practice · 2023Article
- Influence of fluid balance on postoperative outcomes after hepatic resection in patients with left ventricular diastolic dysfunction.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
- Delhi Model: A New Tool for Predicting Response to Terlipressin in Hepatorenal Syndrome-Acute Kidney Injury.Journal of clinical and experimental hepatologyArticle
- Evaluation of Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) Biomarkers FABP1, NGAL, Cystatin C and IL-18 in an Indian Cohort of Hospitalized Acute-on-chronic Liver Failure (ACLF) Patients.Journal of clinical and experimental hepatologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute kidney injury (AKI) is common in advanced cirrhosis. Prerenal azotemia, hepatorenal syndrome, and acute tubular necrosis are the main causes of AKI in patients with cirrhosis. Evaluation of renal function and differentiation between functional and structural kidney injury are important issues in the management of cirrhosis. However, AKI in cirrhosis exists as a complex clinical spectrum rather than concrete clinical entity. Based on current evidence, changes in serum creatinine (Cr) levels remain the most appropriate standard for defining AKI in cirrhosis. However, serum Cr has a limited role in assessing renal function in this population. This review examines previous studies that investigated the ability of recent biomarkers for AKI in cirrhosis from the perspective of earlier and accurate diagnosis, classification of AKI phenotype, and prediction of clinical outcomes. Serum cystatin C and urine neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin have been extensively studied in cirrhosis, and have facilitated improved diagnosis and prognosis prediction in patients with AKI. In addition, urine N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase, interleukin 18, and kidney injury molecule 1 are other promising biomarkers for advanced cirrhosis. However, the clinical significance of these markers remains unclear because there are no cut-off values defining the normal range and differentiating phenotypes of AKI. In addition, AKI has been defined in terms of serum Cr, and renal biopsy-the gold standard-has not been carried out in most studies. Further discovery of innovate biomarkers and incorporation of various markers could improve the diagnosis and prognosis prediction of AKI, and will translate into meaningful improvements in patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.