Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34333876›Full record

ArticleBrain and behavior2021

Psychological effects of the COVID-19 pandemic: Perceived stress, anxiety, work-family imbalance, and coping strategies among healthcare professionals in Khartoum state hospitals, Sudan, 2021.

Ibrahim M Mahgoub, Amani Abdelrahman, Tibyan A Abdallah, Khabab Abbasher Hussien Mohamed Ahmed, Mohammed Eltahier Abdalla Omer, ElMuiz Abdelrahman, Zeinab Mohammed Amara Salih

RetractedOpen access · goldAbstract readRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Article in Brain and behavior, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ibrahim M MahgoubFaculty of Medicine, University of Khartoum, Khartoum, Sudan.ORCID 0000-0003-4196-874X
Amani AbdelrahmanFaculty of Medicine, Alzaiem Alazhari University, Khartoum, Sudan.
Tibyan A AbdallahFaculty of Medicine, University of Khartoum, Khartoum, Sudan.
Khabab Abbasher Hussien Mohamed AhmedFaculty of Medicine, University of Khartoum, Khartoum, Sudan.
Mohammed Eltahier Abdalla OmerFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Gadarif University, Gadarif, Sudan.ORCID 0000-0002-7131-423X
ElMuiz AbdelrahmanFaculty of Medicine, University of Khartoum, Khartoum, Sudan.
Zeinab Mohammed Amara SalihFaculty of Medicine, University of Khartoum, Khartoum, Sudan.
University of Khartoum · SDAlzaiem Alazhari University · SDGadarif University · SD

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19) is highly contagious and can spread a pandemic, so it is related to serious health issues and major public concerns, and is considered by the medical community to be the greatest concern because it is the greatest risk of infection.

objectiveTo identify and assess the psychological effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare professionals in Khartoum state hospitals 2021. MATERIALS AND

methodsGeneralized Anxiety Scale (GAD-7), Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10), and Work-Family Balance Measure Scale were used to assess the psychological impact of doctors and nurses working in four big hospitals in Sudan, by an online questionnaire, analyzed by the statistical package for social science (SPSS) during February.

resultsMost of the participants had minimal to mild anxiety according to GAD-7 score, 121 (35.2%) and 103 (29.9%), respectively. Using PSS-10, the cutoff point was determined as 19 as the mean for total score was 19.2 ± 6.2, accordingly, more than half had high levels of stress (scored 19 and above) 189 (54.9%). For the Work-Family Balance Scale, 10 was regarded as the cutoff point. There was a significant association between specialty and stress level p-value .032. No significant correlations were found between age and stress level, neither between age and anxiety level (r -.100, p-value .064 and r = -.022, p-value .683, respectively).

conclusionMore than half of healthcare professionals (54.9%) showed high levels of stress. Most of the healthcare professionals had poor work-family balance (60.2%).

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsAdaptation, PsychologicalAnxietyCross-Sectional StudiesDelivery of Health CareHospitals, StateHumansSARS-CoV-2Stress, PsychologicalSudananxietyCOVID-19doctors and nursesstressSudan

Identifiers

PMID34333876
PMCPMC8413817
OpenAlexW3170380977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.