Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34333769›Full record

ArticleJournal of anatomy2022

Wild versus lab house mice: Effects of age, diet, and genetics on molar geometry and topography.

Yoland Savriama, Caroline Romestaing, Angéline Clair, Laetita Averty, Julie Ulmann, Ronan Ledevin, Sabrina Renaud

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of anatomy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yoland SavriamaMax-Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, Plön, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9980-584X
Caroline RomestaingLaboratoire d'Écologie des Hydrosystèmes Naturels et Anthropisés (LEHNA), ENTPE, Université de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, UMR 5023 CNRS, Villeurbanne, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6877-9626
Angéline ClairPlateforme Animalerie Conventionnelle et Sauvage Expérimentale de la Doua (ACSED), Fédération de Recherche 3728, Université de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, ENS-Lyon, INRAE, INSA, VetAgroSup, Villeurbanne, France.
Laetita AvertyPlateforme Animalerie Conventionnelle et Sauvage Expérimentale de la Doua (ACSED), Fédération de Recherche 3728, Université de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, ENS-Lyon, INRAE, INSA, VetAgroSup, Villeurbanne, France.
Julie UlmannPlateforme Animalerie Conventionnelle et Sauvage Expérimentale de la Doua (ACSED), Fédération de Recherche 3728, Université de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, ENS-Lyon, INRAE, INSA, VetAgroSup, Villeurbanne, France.
Ronan LedevinPACEA, UMR 5199 CNRS, Université de Bordeaux, Pessac, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1936-9612
Sabrina RenaudLaboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive, UMR 5558, CNRS, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Université de Lyon, Villeurbanne, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8730-3113

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molar morphology is shaped by phylogenetic history and adaptive processes related to food processing. Topographic parameters of the occlusal surface, such as sharpness and relief, can be especially informative regarding diet preferences of a species. The occlusal surface can however be deeply modified by wear throughout an animal's life, potentially obliterating other signals. Age being difficult to assess in wild populations, especially small rodents, experimental studies of wear through age in laboratory populations may constitute a powerful way to assess its impact on molar geometry and topography, and to validate descriptors of molar morphology that could mitigate this issue. Molar morphology was therefore quantified using 3D geometric morphometrics and topographic estimates in four groups of house mice: wild-trapped mice, lab-bred offspring of these wild mice, typical laboratory mice, and their hybrids. Three descriptors of the molar morphology were considered: the surface of the whole molar row, the surface of the first upper molar, and a truncated template of the first upper molar mimicking advanced wear. Increasing wear with age was demonstrated in the different groups, with a more pronounced effect in the wild-trapped population. The geometry of the molar row is not only modified by wear, but also by the relative position of the late developing molars on the jaw due to loading during mastication. As a consequence, the alignment of the molars is modified in wild mice, showing a qualitative difference between wild animals and their lab-bred offspring. Results obtained from the lab should thus be transferred with caution to the interpretation of differences in wild populations. Topographic estimates computed for the first upper molar seems to provide more stable parameters than those based on the whole molar row, because issues related to non-planar occlusal surface along the molar row are discarded. The truncated template was proven efficient in discarding the wear effect to focus on genetic differences, allowing an efficient characterization of the hybridization signature between wild and lab mice. Dominance of the wild phenotype for the first molar shape supports that the lab strain evolved in a context of relaxation of the selective pressures related to nutrition.

Indexed as

LaboratoriesMolarAnimalsDietMasticationMicePhylogenydental functional morphologygeometric morphometricshybridizationmasticationMus musculus domesticusocclusal relief

Identifiers

PMID34333769
PMCPMC8655182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.