ArticleBiomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology2021
Machine learning for detection of stenoses and aneurysms: application in a physiologically realistic virtual patient database.
Article in Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Synthetic, Population-Based Virtual Patient Database Using a Digital Twin of the Cardiovascular System.Cardiovascular engineering and technology · 2026Article
- Deep Learning-Enabled Diagnosis of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Using Pulse Volume Recording Waveforms: An In Silico Study.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A Computationally Efficient and Causal Frequency Domain Formalism for Hemodynamics Allowing for Nonlinearities and Generalized Coupling Conditions.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2025Article
- Developing technologies to assess vascular ageing: a roadmap from VascAgeNet.Physiological measurement · 2024Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Cardiology and Atherosclerosis in the Context of Precision Medicine: A Scoping Review.Applied bionics and biomechanics · 2024Article
- Peripheral artery disease diagnosis based on deep learning-enabled analysis of non-invasive arterial pulse waveforms.Computers in biology and medicine · 2024Article
- Noninvasive hemodynamic indices of vascular aging: an in silico assessment.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2023Article
- Overcoming the Challenges in the Development and Implementation of Artificial Intelligence in Radiology: A Comprehensive Review of Solutions Beyond Supervised Learning.Korean journal of radiology · 2023Review
- A method for real-time mechanical characterisation of microcapsules.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2023Article
- Arterial pulse wave modeling and analysis for vascular-age studies: a review from VascAgeNet.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2023Review
- Non-Invasive Pressure-Only Aortic Wave Intensity Evaluation Using Hybrid Fourier Decomposition-Machine Learning Approach.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2023Article
- Chronic Kidney Disease as a Cardiovascular Disorder-Tonometry Data Analyses.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Observational
- The health digital twin to tackle cardiovascular disease-a review of an emerging interdisciplinary field.NPJ digital medicine · 2022Review
- The health digital twin: advancing precision cardiovascular medicine.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study presents an application of machine learning (ML) methods for detecting the presence of stenoses and aneurysms in the human arterial system. Four major forms of arterial disease-carotid artery stenosis (CAS), subclavian artery stenosis (SAS), peripheral arterial disease (PAD), and abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA)-are considered. The ML methods are trained and tested on a physiologically realistic virtual patient database (VPD) containing 28,868 healthy subjects, adapted from the authors previous work and augmented to include disease. It is found that the tree-based methods of Random Forest and Gradient Boosting outperform other approaches. The performance of ML methods is quantified through the [Formula: see text] score and computation of sensitivities and specificities. When using six haemodynamic measurements (pressure in the common carotid, brachial, and radial arteries; and flow-rate in the common carotid, brachial, and femoral arteries), it is found that maximum [Formula: see text] scores larger than 0.9 are achieved for CAS and PAD, larger than 0.85 for SAS, and larger than 0.98 for both low- and high-severity AAAs. Corresponding sensitivities and specificities are larger than 90% for CAS and PAD, larger than 85% for SAS, and larger than 98% for both low- and high-severity AAAs. When reducing the number of measurements, performance is degraded by less than 5% when three measurements are used, and less than 10% when only two measurements are used for classification. For AAA, it is shown that [Formula: see text] scores larger than 0.85 and corresponding sensitivities and specificities larger than 85% are achievable when using only a single measurement. The results are encouraging to pursue AAA monitoring and screening through wearable devices which can reliably measure pressure or flow-rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.