Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34333696›Full record

ArticleBiomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology2021

Machine learning for detection of stenoses and aneurysms: application in a physiologically realistic virtual patient database.

G Jones, J Parr, P Nithiarasu, S Pant

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Noninvasive hemodynamic indices of vascular aging: an in silico assessment.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. A method for real-time mechanical characterisation of microcapsules.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2023
    Article
  10. Arterial pulse wave modeling and analysis for vascular-age studies: a review from VascAgeNet.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Chronic Kidney Disease as a Cardiovascular Disorder-Tonometry Data Analyses.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Observational
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

G JonesFaculty of Science and Engineering, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3196-6663
J ParrMcLaren Technology Centre, Woking, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5956-217X
P NithiarasuFaculty of Science and Engineering, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4901-2980
S PantFaculty of Science and Engineering, Swansea University, Swansea, UK. Sanjay.Pant@swansea.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2081-308X

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/N509553/1Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/R010811/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study presents an application of machine learning (ML) methods for detecting the presence of stenoses and aneurysms in the human arterial system. Four major forms of arterial disease-carotid artery stenosis (CAS), subclavian artery stenosis (SAS), peripheral arterial disease (PAD), and abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA)-are considered. The ML methods are trained and tested on a physiologically realistic virtual patient database (VPD) containing 28,868 healthy subjects, adapted from the authors previous work and augmented to include disease. It is found that the tree-based methods of Random Forest and Gradient Boosting outperform other approaches. The performance of ML methods is quantified through the [Formula: see text] score and computation of sensitivities and specificities. When using six haemodynamic measurements (pressure in the common carotid, brachial, and radial arteries; and flow-rate in the common carotid, brachial, and femoral arteries), it is found that maximum [Formula: see text] scores larger than 0.9 are achieved for CAS and PAD, larger than 0.85 for SAS, and larger than 0.98 for both low- and high-severity AAAs. Corresponding sensitivities and specificities are larger than 90% for CAS and PAD, larger than 85% for SAS, and larger than 98% for both low- and high-severity AAAs. When reducing the number of measurements, performance is degraded by less than 5% when three measurements are used, and less than 10% when only two measurements are used for classification. For AAA, it is shown that [Formula: see text] scores larger than 0.85 and corresponding sensitivities and specificities larger than 85% are achievable when using only a single measurement. The results are encouraging to pursue AAA monitoring and screening through wearable devices which can reliably measure pressure or flow-rates.

Indexed as

Databases, FactualMachine LearningAlgorithmsAortic Aneurysm, AbdominalCarotid StenosisHumansModels, BiologicalNeural Networks, ComputerPeripheral Arterial DiseaseRegional Blood FlowSensitivity and SpecificitySeverity of Illness IndexSubclavian ArteryUser-Computer InterfaceAneurysmMachine learningPulse wave haemodynamicsScreeningStenosisVirtual patients

Identifiers

PMID34333696
PMCPMC8595223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.