Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34333651›Full record

ArticleJournal of pediatric psychology2021

Parent-Adolescent Concordance Regarding Fertility Perspectives and Sperm Banking Attempts in Adolescent Males With Cancer.

Leena Nahata, Anna Olsavsky, Taylor M Dattilo, Keagan G Lipak, Stacy Whiteside, Nicholas D Yeager, Anthony Audino, Joseph Rausch, James L Klosky, Sarah H O'Brien and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pediatric psychology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04268004 (Optimizing Fertility Preservation and Decision Quality in Male AYA With Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04268004 nacompletednot on this map

Optimizing Fertility Preservation and Decision Quality in Male AYA With Cancer: A Family-centered Intervention

TypeinterventionalSponsorLeena NahataRan2021 to 2025Enrolled53ConditionsInfertility, MaleArmsFP Decision Tool and Discussion
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Leena NahataThe Abigail Wexner Research Institute.ORCID 0000-0003-3899-2642
Anna OlsavskyThe Abigail Wexner Research Institute.
Taylor M DattiloThe Abigail Wexner Research Institute.
Keagan G LipakThe Abigail Wexner Research Institute.
Stacy WhitesideNationwide Children's Hospital.
Nicholas D YeagerNationwide Children's Hospital.
Anthony AudinoNationwide Children's Hospital.
Joseph RauschThe Abigail Wexner Research Institute.
James L KloskyDepartment of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine & The Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta.
Sarah H O'BrienThe Abigail Wexner Research Institute.
Gwendolyn P QuinnNew York University Grossman School of Medicine.
Cynthia A GerhardtThe Abigail Wexner Research Institute.
Nationwide Children's Hospital · USThe Ohio State University · USEmory University · USNew York University · US

Funding

Optimizing fertility preservation and decision quality in male AYA with cancer: A family-centered interventionK08CA237338 · NCI · RESEARCH INST NATIONWIDE CHILDREN'S HOSP · PI NAHATA, LEENA · 2019 to 2023
$1.0M
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA237338
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveApproximately half of male childhood cancer survivors experience impaired fertility, yet fertility preservation (FP) remains underutilized. Although parent recommendation influences adolescents' decision-making, parents may be uncertain and/or underrate their sons' parenthood goals. This study assessed parent-adolescent and family-level concordance regarding adolescent fertility perspectives (i.e., values, goals) and associations with FP attempts.

methodsA prospective pilot study examined the impact of a family-centered values clarification tool (FAST) on banking attempts among adolescent males newly diagnosed with cancer at risk for infertility. The FAST assessed adolescent and parent perceptions of adolescents' fertility values and goals (i.e., perceived threat of infertility, perceived benefits/barriers to banking). Parent-adolescent concordance and family-level concordance on fertility perspectives were examined, along with associations with banking attempts and salient demographic factors.

resultsNinety-eight participants (32 adolescents aged 12-20, 37 mothers, 29 fathers) from 32 families completed the FAST before treatment initiation. Parent-adolescent dyads were concordant on approximately one-half of responses. Banking attempts were associated with higher family-level concordance regarding perceived benefits, r(32) = .40, p = .02. Older adolescent age was associated with higher family-level concordance regarding perceived threat, r(31) = .37, p = .04, and benefits, r(32) = .40, p = .03. Fathers' education was associated with higher family-level concordance regarding barriers, r(21) = .53, p = .01.

conclusionsWhen parents were concordant with their son's fertility values and goals, particularly perceived benefits, adolescents were more likely to attempt FP. Clinicians should facilitate sharing of fertility perspectives within families before cancer treatment, especially with younger adolescents. Psychosocial support for families facing FP decisions is recommended at diagnosis and across the care continuum.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsParentsAdolescentChildFemaleHumansMalePilot ProjectsProspective StudiesSpermatozoaSurveys and Questionnairesadolescentsfertility preservationparent–adolescent communicationpediatric oncologysexual or reproductive health

Identifiers

PMID34333651
PMCPMC8561244
OpenAlexW3190160840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.