Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34332639›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences2021

Impact of an antimicrobial stewardship in a 126-bed community hospital with close communication between pharmacists working on post-prescription audit, ward pharmacists, and the antimicrobial stewardship team.

Satoshi Nakamura, Takashi Arima, Ryoichi Tashiro, Satomi Yasumizu, Hayato Aikou, Emi Watanabe, Takashi Nakashima, Yuho Nagatomo, Ikuyo Kakimoto, Toshiro Motoya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Practical and clinical significance of the pharmacist-led antimicrobial stewardship.Journal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The role of the clinical pharmacist in antimicrobial stewardship in Asia: A review.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Satoshi NakamuraInfection Control Team and Antimicrobial Stewardship Team, Tarumizu Chuo Hospital, Tarumizu Municipal Medical Center, Tarumizu, Japan.
Takashi ArimaInfection Control Team and Antimicrobial Stewardship Team, Tarumizu Chuo Hospital, Tarumizu Municipal Medical Center, Tarumizu, Japan.
Ryoichi TashiroInfection Control Team and Antimicrobial Stewardship Team, Tarumizu Chuo Hospital, Tarumizu Municipal Medical Center, Tarumizu, Japan.
Satomi YasumizuInfection Control Team and Antimicrobial Stewardship Team, Tarumizu Chuo Hospital, Tarumizu Municipal Medical Center, Tarumizu, Japan.
Hayato AikouDivision of Pharmacy, Tarumizu Chuo Hospital, Tarumizu Municipal Medical Center, Tarumizu, Japan.
Emi WatanabeDivision of Pharmacy, Tarumizu Chuo Hospital, Tarumizu Municipal Medical Center, Tarumizu, Japan.
Takashi NakashimaDivision of Pharmacy, Tarumizu Chuo Hospital, Tarumizu Municipal Medical Center, Tarumizu, Japan.
Yuho NagatomoDivision of Pharmacy, Tarumizu Chuo Hospital, Tarumizu Municipal Medical Center, Tarumizu, Japan.
Ikuyo KakimotoDivision of Pharmacy, Tarumizu Chuo Hospital, Tarumizu Municipal Medical Center, Tarumizu, Japan.
Toshiro MotoyaDivision of Pharmacy, Tarumizu Chuo Hospital, Tarumizu Municipal Medical Center, Tarumizu, Japan. motoya@tarumizumh.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2717-6367

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntimicrobial stewardship (AS) is defined as coordinated interventions to improve and measure the appropriate use of antimicrobial agents. However, available resources for AS differ depending on the size of the clinical setting. Therefore, AS programs based on guidelines need to be selected in order to implement AS in small- to medium-sized hospitals. The present study compared the impact of AS in a 126-bed community hospital between pre- and post-AS periods.

methodsThe present study was retrospectively performed by selecting data on eligible patients from electronic medical records stored in the central database of the hospital. The roles of the AS team included weekly rounds and recommendations on the appropriate use of antimicrobials, and pharmacists working on post-prescription audits and pharmaceutical care at the bedside closely communicated with the AS team to assist with its implementation. As process measurements, the order rate of culture examinations, the conducting rate of de-escalation, antimicrobial use density (AUD), days of therapy (DOT), and the AUD/DOT ratio of carbapenems and tazobactam-piperacillin (TAZ/PIPC) were measured. Thirty-day mortality and recurrence rates were examined as clinical outcomes.

resultsA total of 535 patients (288 in the pre-AS period and 247 in the post-AS period) were enrolled in the present study. The recommendation rate to prescribers significantly increased (p < 0.01) from 10.4% in the pre-AS period to 21.1% in the post-AS period. The order rate of culture examinations increased from 56.3 to 73.3% (p < 0.01). The conducting rate of de-escalation increased from 10.2 to 30.8% (p < 0.05). The AUD of carbapenems and TAZ/PIPC significantly decreased (p < 0.05). The DOT of carbapenems (p < 0.01) and TAZ/PIPC (p < 0.05) also significantly decreased. The AUD/DOT ratio of carbapenem significantly increased from 0.37 to 0.60 (p < 0.01). Thirty-day mortality rates were 11.2 and 14.2%, respectively, and were not significantly different. The 30-day recurrence rate significantly decreased (p < 0.05) from 14.7 to 7.5%.

conclusionsThe implementation of AS in this hospital improved the appropriate use of antimicrobials without negatively affecting clinical outcomes. These results may be attributed to close communication between pharmacists working on post-prescription audits and pharmaceutical care at the bedside and the AS team.

Indexed as

30-day mortality30-day recurrence rateAntimicrobial stewardshipAntimicrobial stewardship teamAntimicrobial use densityAppropriate use of antimicrobialsCulture examinationDays of therapyDe-escalationPharmacist

Identifiers

PMID34332639
PMCPMC8325832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.