Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34332567›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2021

Determinants of perceived health and unmet healthcare needs in universal healthcare systems with high gender equality.

Christina P Tadiri, Teresa Gisinger, Alexandra Kautzky-Willer, Karolina Kublickiene, Maria Trinidad Herrero, Colleen M Norris, Valeria Raparelli, Louise Pilote, GOING-FWD Consortium

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Christina P Tadiri *Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre, Division of Clinical Epidemiology McGill University, Montreal, Canada. christina.tadiri@mail.mcgill.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-9305-1960
Teresa Gisinger *Department of Medicine III, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Alexandra Kautzky-WillerDepartment of Medicine III, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Karolina KublickieneDepartment of Renal Medicine, Institution for Clinical Science, Intervention & Technology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Maria Trinidad HerreroClinical and Experimental Neuroscience (NiCE), Institute for Aging Research, Institute for Bio-Health Research of Murcia (IMIB), School of Medicine, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
Colleen M NorrisFaculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Valeria RaparelliDepartment of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Louise PiloteResearch Institute of McGill University Health Centre, Division of Clinical Epidemiology McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
GOING-FWD Consortium

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF I 4209
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient attitudes about health and healthcare have emerged as important outcomes to assess in clinical studies. Gender is increasingly recognized as an intersectional social construct that may influence health. Our objective was to determine potential sex differences in self-reported overall health and access to healthcare and whether those differences are influenced by individual social factors in two relatively similar countries.

methodsTwo public health surveys from countries with high gender equality (measured by UN GII) and universal healthcare systems, Canada (CCHS2014, n = 57,041) and Austria (AT-HIS2014, n = 15,212), were analysed. Perceived health was assessed on a scale of 1 (very bad) to 4 (very good) and perceived unmet healthcare needs was reported as a dichotomous variable (yes/no). Interactions between sex and social determinants (i.e. employment, education level, immigration and marital status) on outcomes were analysed.

resultsIndividuals in both countries reported high perceived health (Scoring > 2, 85.0% in Canada, 79.9% in Austria) and a low percentage reported unmet healthcare needs (4.6% in Canada, 10.7% in Austria). In both countries, sex and several social factors were associated with high perceived health, and a sex-by-marital status interaction was observed, with a greater negative impact of divorce for men. Female sex was positively associated with unmet care needs in both countries, and sex-by-social factors interactions were only detected in Canada.

conclusionsThe intersection of sex and social factors in influencing patient-relevant outcomes varies even among countries with similar healthcare and high gender equality.

Indexed as

Gender EquityUniversal Health CareAustriaCanadaDelivery of Health CareFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHealth Services Needs and DemandHealth StatusHumansMaleSocioeconomic FactorsCountry/cultural determinants of healthPatient-reported outcomesPublic healthSocial determinants of health

Identifiers

PMID34332567
PMCPMC8325202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.