ArticleBMC medical research methodology2021
Machine learning in medicine: a practical introduction to natural language processing.
Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
50 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 161 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identifying abdominal aortic aneurysm size and presence using Natural Language Processing of radiology reports: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Pooled it
- AI in Medical Questionnaires: Scoping ReviewJournal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- Trends in AI-based diagnosis and intervention of metabolic diseases: a bibliometric analysis of the literature from 2000 to 2024.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- The use of natural language processing in detecting and predicting falls within the healthcare setting: a systematic review.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2023Pooled it
- Optimizing arthroplasty outcomes: the impact of artificial intelligence and robotic assistance.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Review
- Factors associated with healthcare professionals' use of stigmatizing language in individuals with diabetes in pregnancy.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence and digital transformation of gastroenterology and hepatology: A critical review of clinical applications and future challenges.World journal of hepatology · 2026Review
- Leveraging natural language processing and machine learning to identify chronic conditions from primary care electronic medical records.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a multifactorial risk prediction model for breast cancer patients with co-occurring thyroid cancer: a retrospective matched case-control study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Device-level nonlinearity and temporal memory in optoelectronic reservoir computing.Nano convergence · 2025Review
- Analytic Methods to Investigate HIV-Related Digital Communication: A Scoping Review.Current HIV/AIDS reports · 2025Article
- Exploring Artificial Intelligence's Potential to Enhance Conventional Anticancer Drug Development.Drug development research · 2025Review
- Harnessing AI-driven reverse docking in drug discovery: a comprehensive review of opportunities, challenges, and emerging trends.Journal of molecular modeling · 2025Review
- Machine Learning Framework for Ovarian Cancer Diagnostics Using Plasma Lipidomics and Metabolomics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Establishing a Validation Framework of Treatment Discontinuation in Claims Data Using Natural Language Processing and Electronic Health Records.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2025Article
- Closed circuit artificial ıntelligence model named morgaf for childhood onset systemic lupus erythematosus diagnosis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A case study on generative artificial intelligence to extract the fundamental sleep parameters from polysomnography notes.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2025Article
- Predicting the Higher Energy Need for Effective Defibrillation Using Machine Learning Based on an Animal Model.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Externally validated and clinically useful machine learning algorithms to support patient-related decision-making in oncology: a scoping review.BMC medical research methodology · 2025Article
- Machine learning tools match physician accuracy in multilingual text annotation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUnstructured text, including medical records, patient feedback, and social media comments, can be a rich source of data for clinical research. Natural language processing (NLP) describes a set of techniques used to convert passages of written text into interpretable datasets that can be analysed by statistical and machine learning (ML) models. The purpose of this paper is to provide a practical introduction to contemporary techniques for the analysis of text-data, using freely-available software.
methodsWe performed three NLP experiments using publicly-available data obtained from medicine review websites. First, we conducted lexicon-based sentiment analysis on open-text patient reviews of four drugs: Levothyroxine, Viagra, Oseltamivir and Apixaban. Next, we used unsupervised ML (latent Dirichlet allocation, LDA) to identify similar drugs in the dataset, based solely on their reviews. Finally, we developed three supervised ML algorithms to predict whether a drug review was associated with a positive or negative rating. These algorithms were: a regularised logistic regression, a support vector machine (SVM), and an artificial neural network (ANN). We compared the performance of these algorithms in terms of classification accuracy, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity and specificity.
resultsLevothyroxine and Viagra were reviewed with a higher proportion of positive sentiments than Oseltamivir and Apixaban. One of the three LDA clusters clearly represented drugs used to treat mental health problems. A common theme suggested by this cluster was drugs taking weeks or months to work. Another cluster clearly represented drugs used as contraceptives. Supervised machine learning algorithms predicted positive or negative drug ratings with classification accuracies ranging from 0.664, 95% CI [0.608, 0.716] for the regularised regression to 0.720, 95% CI [0.664,0.776] for the SVM.
conclusionsIn this paper, we present a conceptual overview of common techniques used to analyse large volumes of text, and provide reproducible code that can be readily applied to other research studies using open-source software.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.