ArticleInternational journal of medical informatics2021
Challenges in replicating secondary analysis of electronic health records data with multiple computable phenotypes: A case study on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia infections.
Article in International journal of medical informatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Robust privacy amidst innovation with large language models through a critical assessment of the risks.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025Article
- A bibliometric analysis of 16,826 triple-negative breast cancer publications using multiple machine learning algorithms: Progress in the past 17 years.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundReplication of prediction modeling using electronic health records (EHR) is challenging because of the necessity to compute phenotypes including study cohort, outcomes, and covariates. However, some phenotypes may not be easily replicated across EHR data sources due to a variety of reasons such as the lack of gold standard definitions and documentation variations across systems, which may lead to measurement error and potential bias. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections are responsible for high mortality worldwide. With limited treatment options for the infection, the ability to predict MRSA outcome is of interest. However, replicating these MRSA outcome prediction models using EHR data is problematic due to the lack of well-defined computable phenotypes for many of the predictors as well as study inclusion and outcome criteria.
objectiveIn this study, we aimed to evaluate a prediction model for 30-day mortality after MRSA bacteremia infection diagnosis with reduced vancomycin susceptibility (MRSA-RVS) considering multiple computable phenotypes using EHR data.
methodsWe used EHR data from a large academic health center in the United States to replicate the original study conducted in Taiwan. We derived multiple computable phenotypes of risk factors and predictors used in the original study, reported stratified descriptive statistics, and assessed the performance of the prediction model.
resultsIn our replication study, it was possible to (re)compute most of the original variables. Nevertheless, for certain variables, their computable phenotypes can only be approximated by proxy with structured EHR data items, especially the composite clinical indices such as the Pitt bacteremia score. Even computable phenotype for the outcome variable was subject to variation on the basis of the admission/discharge windows. The replicated prediction model exhibited only a mild discriminatory ability.
conclusionDespite the rich information in EHR data, replication of prediction models involving complex predictors is still challenging, often due to the limited availability of validated computable phenotypes. On the other hand, it is often possible to derive proxy computable phenotypes that can be further validated and calibrated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.