Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34332217›Full record

Observational studyThe American journal of emergency medicine2021

Admission SpO

Ahmed Mukhtar, Ashraf Rady, Ahmed Hasanin, Ahmed Lotfy, Akram El Adawy, Amr Hussein, Islam El-Hefnawy, Mohamed Hassan, Hanan Mostafa

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The American journal of emergency medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. OMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Deciding When to Intubate a COVID-19 Patient.Anesthesiology and pain medicine · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ahmed MukhtarAnesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care Department, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Ashraf RadyAnesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care Department, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Ahmed HasaninAnesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care Department, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt. Electronic address: ahmedmohamedhasanin@gmail.com.
Ahmed LotfyAnesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care Department, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Akram El AdawyAnesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care Department, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Amr HusseinAnesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care Department, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Islam El-HefnawyRadiology Department, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Mohamed HassanPulmonology Department, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Hanan MostafaAnesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care Department, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of pulse oximetry-derived oxygen saturation (SpO

methodsIn this retrospective observational study, demographic and clinical details of the patients were obtained during ICU admission. SpO

resultsWe included 72 critically ill patients who tested COVID-19-positive. SpO

conclusionsA baseline SpO

Indexed as

Critical CareOxygen SaturationRespiration, ArtificialRespiratory RateAdultAgedBlood Gas AnalysisCOVID-19Diagnostic Tests, RoutineFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedOxygen Inhalation TherapyPredictive Value of TestsCOVID-19Mechanical ventilatory supportPeripheral oxygen saturationROX index

Identifiers

PMID34332217
PMCPMC8313790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.