ArticleHearing research2021
Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions are biomarkers for mice with tectorial membrane defects.
Article in Hearing research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Auditory cellular cooperativity probed via spontaneous otoacoustic emissions.Biophysical journal · 2025Article
- Tectorial membrane: structure, function, and its implications for hearing loss.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Review
- Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions in Mice Above and Below the Eliciting Primaries.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2023Article
- Whistling While it Works: Spontaneous Otoacoustic Emissions and the Cochlear Amplifier.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Cochlear function depends on the operation of a coupled feedback loop, incorporating outer hair cells (OHCs), and structured to assure that inner hair cells (IHCs) convey frequency specific acoustic information to the brain, even at very low sound levels. Although our knowledge of OHC function and its contribution to cochlear amplification has expanded, the importance of the tectorial membrane (TM) to the processing of mechanical inputs has not been fully elucidated. In addition, there are a surprising number of genetic mutations that affect TM structure and that produce hearing loss in humans. By synthesizing old and new results obtained on several mouse mutants, we learned that animals with abnormal TMs are prone to generate spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAE), which are uncommon in most wildtype laboratory animals. Because SOAEs are not produced in TM mutants or in humans when threshold shifts exceed approximately 25 dB, some degree of cochlear amplification is required. However, amplification by itself is not sufficient because normal mice are rarely spontaneous emitters. Since SOAEs reflect active cochlear operation, TM mutants are valuable for studying the oscillatory nature of the amplification process and the structures associated with its stabilization. Inasmuch as the mouse models were selected to mirror human auditory disorders, using SOAEs as a noninvasive clinical tool may assist the classification of individuals with genetic defects that influence the active mechanisms responsible for sensitivity and frequency selectivity, the hallmarks of mammalian hearing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.