ReviewNeuroscience letters2021
Mini review: Biomaterials in repair and regeneration of nerve in a volumetric muscle loss.
Review in Neuroscience letters, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Melatonin accelerated angiogenesis activity of alginate-gelatin encapsulated endothelial progenitor cells in a mouse model of volumetric muscle loss.Journal of biological engineering · 2026Article
- Nanotechnology-mediated strategies for skeletal muscle repair and regeneration: targeted intervention, functional remodeling, and translational challenges.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Review
- Advancements in skeletal muscle tissue engineering: strategies for repair and regeneration of skeletal muscle beyond self-repair.Regenerative biomaterials · 2025Review
- Accelerated innervation of biofabricated skeletal muscle implants containing a neurotrophic factor delivery system.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Article
- An electroencephalography-based human-machine interface combined with contralateral C7 transfer in the treatment of brachial plexus injury.Neural regeneration research · 2022Review
- Magnetic Nanofibrous Scaffolds Accelerate the Regeneration of Muscle Tissue in Combination with Extra Magnetic Fields.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Volumetric muscle loss (VML) following a severe trauma or injury is beyond the intrinsic regenerative capacity of muscle tissues, and hence interventional therapy is required. Extensive muscle loss concomitant with damage to neuromuscular components overwhelms the muscles' remarkable regenerative capacity. The loss of nervous and vascular tissue leads to further damage and atrophy, so a combined treatment for neuromuscular junction (NMJ) along with the volumetric muscle regeneration is important. There have been immense advances in the field of tissue engineering for skeletal muscle tissue and peripheral nerve regeneration, but very few address the interdependence of the tissues and the need for combined therapies to repair and regenerate fully functional muscle tissue. This review addresses the problem and presents an overview of the biomaterials that have been studied for tissue engineering of neuromuscular tissues associated with skeletal muscles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.