Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34331921›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental research2022

A review of methods to reduce the probability of the airborne spread of COVID-19 in ventilation systems and enclosed spaces.

Gentry Berry, Adam Parsons, Matthew Morgan, Jaime Rickert, Heejin Cho

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 103 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Managing infectious aerosols to counter engineered pandemics: Current recommendations and future research.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2025
    Guideline
  2. Article
  3. A Virus Aerosol Chamber Study: The Impact of UVA, UVC, and HEnvironment & health (Washington, D.C.) · 2025
    Article
  4. Methodology of Epidemic Risk Analysis in the Naval Military.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Risk assessment of infection of COVID-19 contacts based on scenario simulation.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Inactivation of airborne SARS-Co-V2 using NTP-UVGI hybrid process.International journal of environmental science and technology : IJEST · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gentry BerryInstitute for Clean Energy Technology, Mississippi State University, 205 Research Blvd, Starkville, MS, 39759, USA.
Adam ParsonsInstitute for Clean Energy Technology, Mississippi State University, 205 Research Blvd, Starkville, MS, 39759, USA.
Matthew MorganInstitute for Clean Energy Technology, Mississippi State University, 205 Research Blvd, Starkville, MS, 39759, USA.
Jaime RickertInstitute for Clean Energy Technology, Mississippi State University, 205 Research Blvd, Starkville, MS, 39759, USA.
Heejin ChoInstitute for Clean Energy Technology, Mississippi State University, 205 Research Blvd, Starkville, MS, 39759, USA. Electronic address: cho@me.msstate.edu.
Mississippi State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

COVID-19 forced the human population to rethink its way of living. The threat posed by the potential spread of the virus via an airborne transmission mode through ventilation systems in buildings and enclosed spaces has been recognized as a major concern. To mitigate this threat, researchers have explored different technologies and methods that can remove or decrease the concentration of the virus in ventilation systems and enclosed spaces. Although many technologies and methods have already been researched, some are currently available on the market, but their effectiveness and safety concerns have not been fully investigated. To acquire a broader view and collective perspective of the current research and development status, this paper discusses a comprehensive review of various workable technologies and methods to combat airborne viruses, e.g., COVID-19, in ventilation systems and enclosed spaces. These technologies and methods include an increase in ventilation, high-efficiency air filtration, ionization of the air, environmental condition control, ultraviolet germicidal irradiation, non-thermal plasma and reactive oxygen species, filter coatings, chemical disinfectants, and heat inactivation. Research gaps have been identified and discussed, and recommendations for applying such technologies and methods have also been provided in this article.

Indexed as

COVID-19Air ConditioningHumansProbabilitySARS-CoV-2VentilationAirborne virus ventilationBuildingsCOVID-19Enclosed space

Identifiers

PMID34331921
PMCPMC8317458
OpenAlexW3191264823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.