Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34331859›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2021

CLOCKWORK ORANGE promotes CLOCK-CYCLE activation via the putative Drosophila ortholog of CLOCK INTERACTING PROTEIN CIRCADIAN.

Gustavo B S Rivas, Jian Zhou, Christine Merlin, Paul E Hardin

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Circadian rhythms: pervasive, and often times evasive.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Cellular and molecular organization of the Drosophila foregut.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. The Circadian Clock in Lepidoptera.Frontiers in physiology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gustavo B S RivasDepartment of Biology and Center for Biological Clocks Research, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Jian ZhouDepartment of Biology and Center for Biological Clocks Research, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Christine MerlinDepartment of Biology and Center for Biological Clocks Research, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Paul E HardinDepartment of Biology and Center for Biological Clocks Research, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA. Electronic address: phardin@bio.tamu.edu.
Texas A&M University · US

Funding

Mechanisms of Circadian RepressionR01GM124617 · NIGMS · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY · PI PAUL E HARDIN, Christine Merlin · 2017 to 2026
$2.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM124617
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Drosophila circadian clock is driven by a transcriptional feedback loop in which CLOCK-CYCLE (CLK-CYC) binds E-boxes to transcribe genes encoding the PERIOD-TIMELESS (PER-TIM) repressor, which releases CLK-CYC from E-boxes to inhibit transcription. CLOCKWORK ORANGE (CWO) reinforces PER-TIM repression by binding E-boxes to maintain PER-TIM bound CLK-CYC off DNA, but also promotes CLK-CYC transcription through an unknown mechanism. To determine how CWO activates CLK-CYC transcription, we identified CWO target genes that are upregulated in the absence of CWO repression, conserved in mammals, and preferentially expressed in brain pacemaker neurons. Among the genes identified was a putative ortholog of mouse Clock Interacting Protein Circadian (Cipc), which represses CLOCK-BMAL1 transcription. Reducing or eliminating Drosophila Cipc expression shortens period, while overexpressing Cipc lengthens period, which is consistent with previous work showing that Drosophila Cipc represses CLK-CYC transcription in S2 cells. Cipc represses CLK-CYC transcription in vivo, but not uniformly, as per is strongly repressed, tim less so, and vri hardly at all. Long period rhythms in cwo mutant flies are largely rescued when Cipc expression is reduced or eliminated, indicating that increased Cipc expression mediates the period lengthening of cwo mutants. Consistent with this behavioral rescue, eliminating Cipc rescues the decreased CLK-CYC transcription in cwo mutant flies, where per is strongly rescued, tim is moderately rescued, and vri shows little rescue. These results suggest a mechanism for CWO-dependent CLK-CYC activation: CWO inhibition of CIPC repression promotes CLK-CYC transcription. This mechanism may be conserved since cwo and Cipc perform analogous roles in the mammalian circadian clock.

Indexed as

DrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsAnimalsARNTL Transcription FactorsChlorprophamCircadian RhythmCLOCK ProteinsDrosophila melanogasterGene Expression RegulationMammalsMiceTranscription, GeneticARNTL Transcription FactorsChlorprophamCLOCK ProteinsDrosophila Proteinsactivity rhythmsChIP-seqcircadian clockclock gene mutantsDrosophilafeedback loopRNA-seqtranscriptional repression

Identifiers

PMID34331859
PMCPMC8511158
OpenAlexW3192993898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.