Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34331737›Full record

ReviewIntegrated environmental assessment and management2022

An integrated knowledge synthesis of regional ambient monitoring in Canada's oil sands.

David R Roberts, Roderick O Hazewinkel, Tim J Arciszewski, Danielle Beausoleil, Carla J Davidson, Erin C Horb, Diogo Sayanda, Gregory R Wentworth, Faye Wyatt, Monique G Dubé

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Integrated environmental assessment and management, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

David R RobertsAlberta Environment and Parks, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3437-2422
Roderick O HazewinkelAlberta Environment and Parks, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Tim J ArciszewskiAlberta Environment and Parks, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6622-8663
Danielle BeausoleilAlberta Environment and Parks, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8963-2914
Carla J DavidsonEndeavour Scientific Inc., Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4771-0216
Erin C HorbAlberta Environment and Parks, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Diogo SayandaAlberta Environment and Parks, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Gregory R WentworthAlberta Environment and Parks, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Faye WyattUK Met Office, Exeter, UK.
Monique G DubéCumulative Effects Environmental Inc., Okotoks, Alberta, Canada.

Funding

Oil Sands Monitoring Program
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The desire to document and understand the cumulative implications of oil sands (OS) development in the ambient environment of northeastern Alberta has motivated increased investment and release of information in the past decade. Here, we summarize the knowledge presented in the theme-based review papers in this special series, including air, surface water, terrestrial biology, and Indigenous community-based monitoring in order to (1) consolidate knowledge gained to date, (2) highlight key commonalities and gaps, and (3) leverage this knowledge to assess the state of integration in environmental monitoring efforts in the OS region and suggest next steps. Among air, water, and land studies, the individual reviews identified a clear focus on describing stressors, including primarily (1) contaminant emission, transport, transformation, deposition, and exposure, and (2) landscape disturbance. These emphases are generally partitioned by theme; air and water studies focus heavily on chemical stressors, whereas terrestrial monitoring focuses on biological change and landscape disturbance. Causal attribution is often stated as a high priority objective across all themes. However, studies often rely on spatial proximity to attribute cause to industrial activity, leaving causal attribution potentially confounded by spatial covariance of both OS- and non-OS-related stressors in the region, and by the complexity of interacting pathways between sources of environmental change and ecological receptors. Geospatial and modeling approaches are common across themes and may represent clear integration opportunities, particularly to help inform investigation-of-cause, but are not a replacement for robust field monitoring designs. Cumulative effects assessment remains a common focus of regional monitoring, but is limited in the peer-reviewed literature, potentially reflecting a lack of integration among monitoring efforts beyond narrow integrated interpretations of results. Addressing this requires greater emphasis on a priori integrated data collection and integrated analyses focused on the main residual exposure pathways, such as atmospheric deposition. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2022;18:428-441. © 2021 The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC).

Indexed as

Environmental MonitoringOil and Gas FieldsAlbertaEcotoxicologyCumulative effectsEnvironmental monitoringIntegrationOil sands

Identifiers

PMID34331737
PMCPMC9291055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.