Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34331717›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical virology2021

Development and validation of a simplified risk score for the prediction of critical COVID-19 illness in newly diagnosed patients.

Stanislas Werfel, Carolin E M Jakob, Stefan Borgmann, Jochen Schneider, Christoph Spinner, Maximilian Schons, Martin Hower, Kai Wille, Martina Haselberger, Hanno Heuzeroth and 8 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical virology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The SpOJournal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Corrigendum.Journal of medical virology · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Stanislas WerfelDepartment of Nephrology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9130-0057
Carolin E M JakobDepartment I for Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Stefan BorgmannDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Infection Control, Ingolstadt Hospital, Ingolstadt, Germany.
Jochen SchneiderDepartment of Internal Medicine II, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, University Hospital rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.
Christoph SpinnerDepartment of Internal Medicine II, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, University Hospital rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3875-5367
Maximilian SchonsDepartment I for Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Martin HowerDepartment of Pneumology, Infectious Diseases and Internal Medicine, Klinikum Dortmund gGmbH, Dortmund, Germany.
Kai WilleUniversity Clinic for Haematology, Oncology, Haemostaseology and Palliative Care, Johannes Wesling Medical Centre Minden UKRUB, University of Bochum, Minden, Germany.
Martina HaselbergerDepartment of Internal Medicine I, Klinikum Passau, Passau, Germany.
Hanno HeuzerothDepartment of Emergency and Intensive Care Medicine, Klinikum Ernst von Bergmann, Potsdam, Germany.
Maria M RüthrichDepartment of Internal Medicine II, Hematology and Medical Oncology, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany.
Sebastian DolffDepartment of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5549-1706
Johanna KesselDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hematology and Oncology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Uwe HeemannDepartment of Nephrology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.
Jörg J VehreschildDepartment I for Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Siegbert RiegDepartment of Medicine II, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Christoph SchmadererDepartment of Nephrology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.
LEOSS study group
TUM Klinikum · DEGoethe University Frankfurt · DEUniversity of Cologne · DEEssen University Hospital · DEJena University Hospital · DEKlinikum Dortmund · DEKlinikum Ernst von Bergmann · DEKlinikum Ingolstadt · DEKlinikum Passau · DEUniversity Hospitals of the Ruhr-University of Bochum · DEUniversity of Freiburg · DE

Funding

German Centre for Infection ResearchWilly Robert Pitzer Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Scores to identify patients at high risk of progression of coronavirus disease (COVID-19), caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), may become instrumental for clinical decision-making and patient management. We used patient data from the multicentre Lean European Open Survey on SARS-CoV-2-Infected Patients (LEOSS) and applied variable selection to develop a simplified scoring system to identify patients at increased risk of critical illness or death. A total of 1946 patients who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 were included in the initial analysis and assigned to derivation and validation cohorts (n = 1297 and n = 649, respectively). Stability selection from over 100 baseline predictors for the combined endpoint of progression to the critical phase or COVID-19-related death enabled the development of a simplified score consisting of five predictors: C-reactive protein (CRP), age, clinical disease phase (uncomplicated vs. complicated), serum urea, and D-dimer (abbreviated as CAPS-D score). This score yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.81 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.77-0.85) in the validation cohort for predicting the combined endpoint within 7 days of diagnosis and 0.81 (95% CI: 0.77-0.85) during full follow-up. We used an additional prospective cohort of 682 patients, diagnosed largely after the "first wave" of the pandemic to validate the predictive accuracy of the score and observed similar results (AUC for the event within 7 days: 0.83 [95% CI: 0.78-0.87]; for full follow-up: 0.82 [95% CI: 0.78-0.86]). An easily applicable score to calculate the risk of COVID-19 progression to critical illness or death was thus established and validated.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsCOVID-19C-Reactive ProteinFemaleFibrin Fibrinogen Degradation ProductsHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSeverity of Illness IndexUreaC-Reactive ProteinFibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Productsfibrin fragment DUreaCOVID-19logistic modelsmachine learningrisk factors

Identifiers

PMID34331717
PMCPMC8426905
OpenAlexW3126888243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.