Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34331675›Full record

ArticleDrug safety2021

Smart Safety Surveillance (3S): Multi-Country Experience of Implementing the 3S Concepts and Principles.

Noha Iessa, Viola Macolic Sarinic, Lilit Ghazaryan, Naira Romanova, Asnakech Alemu, Watcharee Rungapiromnan, Porntip Jiamsuchon, Pattreya Pokhagul, Jose Luis Castro, Diego Macias Saint-Gerons and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug safety, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Improving adverse drug event reporting by healthcare professionals.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Noha IessaWorld Health Organization Headquarters, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-3480-1466
Viola Macolic SarinicWorld Health Organization Headquarters, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-3563-4030
Lilit GhazaryanScientific Centre of Drug and Medical Technology Expertise of MoH, Yerevan, Armenia.
Naira RomanovaScientific Centre of Drug and Medical Technology Expertise of MoH, Yerevan, Armenia.
Asnakech AlemuEthiopian Food and Drug Administration, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Watcharee RungapiromnanMinistry of Public Health, Thai Food and Drug Administration, Nonthaburi, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-8393-5781
Porntip JiamsuchonMinistry of Public Health, Thai Food and Drug Administration, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Pattreya PokhagulMinistry of Public Health, Thai Food and Drug Administration, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Jose Luis CastroPan American Health Organization, Washington, DC, USA.
Diego Macias Saint-GeronsINCLIVA-CIBERSAM, Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2572-2160
Gayane GhukasyanWHO Country Office, Yerevan, Armenia.
Mengistab TeferiWorld Health Organization Country Office, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Madhur GuptaWHO Country Office, New Delhi, India.
Shanthi Narayan PalWorld Health Organization Headquarters, 20 Avenue Appia, 1202, Geneva, Switzerland. pals@who.int.ORCID 0000-0001-5778-9207

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe Smart Safety Surveillance (3S) concept is based on the understanding that, when faced with competing pharmacovigilance priorities, countries will have to invest judiciously, by focusing on new priority products, sharing work and resources with other countries when possible and building national competence for those activities that cannot be delegated.

methodThe 3S principles were applied to Armenia, Brazil, Ethiopia, India, Peru and Thailand using three priority products: bedaquiline, rotavirus vaccine and tafenoquine. A baseline assessment of pharmacovigilance preparedness was used to identify gaps and establish a work plan. The impact was measured by comparing pre and post 3S-intervention outcomes, which included the number and quality of reports (completeness scores) in the WHO global database of Individual Case Safety Reports, VigiBase, and number of structural indicators met. The implementation period was 9-18 months, ranging from March 2018 (earliest started) until May 2020 (latest).

resultAn increase in adverse drug reaction (ADR) reporting was demonstrated in Armenia (bedaquiline), Brazil (TB and malaria medicines), India (rotavirus vaccine) and Ethiopia (TB medicines). Completeness scores were above 0.5 at baseline in all countries, and reports improved in quality for Brazil (TB), Peru (malaria), Thailand (malaria) and India (immunization). The number of structural indicators met increased by more than double for Ethiopia. Ethiopia and India demonstrated an increased capacity for signal detection and signal evaluation. Armenia, Brazil, Peru and Thailand showed increased capacity to assess risk management plans following the implementation of 3S principles.

conclusionThe 3S concept has demonstrated success in different ways across the six countries. Activities focused on three products for a proof of concept of the 3S principles, with the expectation that the project impact will be sustained through strengthened systems, to guide pharmacovigilance activities of other products in the future. It is important to continue monitoring the countries to understand if the gains and successes of the current 3S project are sustainable.

Indexed as

Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsMalariaRotavirus VaccinesHumansImmunizationPharmacovigilanceRotavirus Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID34331675
PMCPMC8325038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.