Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34331622›Full record

ArticleBiomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology2021

Sensitivity and feasibility of a one-dimensional morphoelastic model for post-burn contraction.

Ginger Egberts, Fred Vermolen, Paul van Zuijlen

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The Future of Burn Care From a Complexity Science Perspective.Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ginger EgbertsDelft Institute of Applied Mathematics, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands. G.Egberts@tudelft.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3601-6496
Fred VermolenResearch Group Computational Mathematics (CMAT), Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Hasselt, Hasselt, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2212-1711
Paul van ZuijlenBurn Centre and Department of Plastic, Reconstructive & Hand Surgery, Red Cross Hospital, Beverwijk, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3461-8848
Hasselt University · BEEmma Kinderziekenhuis · NL

Funding

Nederlandse Brandwonden Stichting Project 17.105.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We consider a one-dimensional morphoelastic model describing post-burn scar contraction. Contraction can lead to a limited range of motion (contracture). Reported prevalence of burn scar contractures are 58.6% at 3-6 weeks and 20.9% at 12 months post-reconstructive surgery after burns. This model describes the displacement of the dermal layer of the skin and the development of the effective Eulerian strain in the tissue. Besides these components, the model also contains components that play a major role in the skin repair after trauma. These components are signaling molecules, fibroblasts, myofibroblasts, and collagen. We perform a sensitivity analysis for many parameters of the model and use the results for a feasibility study. In this study, we test whether the model is suitable for predicting the extent of contraction in different age groups. To this end, we conduct an extensive literature review to find parameter values. From the sensitivity analysis, we conclude that the most sensitive parameters are the equilibrium collagen concentration in the dermal layer, the apoptosis rate of fibroblasts and myofibroblasts, and the secretion rate of signaling molecules. Further, although we can use the model to simulate significant distinct contraction densities in different age groups, our results differ from what is seen in the clinic. This particularly concerns children and elderly patients. In children we see more intense contractures if the burn injury occurs near a joint, because the growth induces extra forces on the tissue. Elderly patients seem to suffer less from contractures, possibly because of excess skin.

Indexed as

ElasticityModels, BiologicalAdolescentAdultAgedAgingBurnsCell CountChildChild, PreschoolConfidence IntervalsContractureFeasibility StudiesFibroblastsHumansInfantBurnsFeasibilityMorphoelasticityMoving-grid finite-elementSensitivityWound contraction

Identifiers

PMID34331622
PMCPMC8595192
OpenAlexW3184240833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.