Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34331606›Full record

ReviewLasers in medical science2022

Laser utility in the treatment of hemorrhoidal pathology: a review of literature.

Aymen Trigui, Haithem Rejab, Amira Akrout, Jihen Trabelsi, Amine Zouari, Youssef Majdoub, Mohamed Ben Amar, Rafik Mzali

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Lasers in medical science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Aymen TriguiDepartment of General and Digestive Surgery, Habib Bourguiba Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sfax, 3029, Sfax, Tunisia. ayman.trigui@gmail.com.
Haithem RejabDepartment of General and Digestive Surgery, Habib Bourguiba Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sfax, 3029, Sfax, Tunisia.
Amira AkroutDepartment of General and Digestive Surgery, Habib Bourguiba Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sfax, 3029, Sfax, Tunisia.
Jihen TrabelsiDepartment of Epidemiology, Hedi Cheker Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sfax, Sfax, Tunisia.
Amine ZouariDepartment of General and Digestive Surgery, Habib Bourguiba Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sfax, 3029, Sfax, Tunisia.
Youssef MajdoubDepartment of General and Digestive Surgery, Habib Bourguiba Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sfax, 3029, Sfax, Tunisia.
Mohamed Ben AmarDepartment of General and Digestive Surgery, Habib Bourguiba Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sfax, 3029, Sfax, Tunisia.
Rafik MzaliDepartment of General and Digestive Surgery, Habib Bourguiba Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sfax, 3029, Sfax, Tunisia.
Hopital Universitaire Habib Bourguiba · TNUniversity of Sfax · TN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hemorrhoidal disease is a common reason for consultation in proctology. It can be treated in several ways (medical, endoscopic, and surgical). Laser treatment has been described since 1960 and has developed in recent years. The purpose of this literature review was to study the results of laser treatment of hemorrhoids and to compare them with those of surgical methods. We performed a systematic search of the literature by querying the Medline, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library databases. Retrospective studies and case reports were excluded. We selected 11 studies both techniques HeLP (hemorrhoid laser procedure) and LHP (laser hemorrhoidoplasty procedure). The total number of patients was 1179 including 1059 patients treated with laser and 120 treated surgically within the context of comparative studies. The age of the patients varies between 18 and 74 years old. HeLP laser treatment was significantly superior to surgical treatment in terms of postoperative pain (p < 0.001), hemorrhoidal disease downgrading (p < 0.001), and postoperative satisfaction (p < 0.001). Similarly, LHP laser treatment was significantly superior to surgical treatment in terms of operative duration (p < 0.00001), intraoperative bleeding (p < 0.00001), postoperative pain at H12 and H24 (p < 0.00001 and p = 0.0003), and postoperative bleeding rate (p < 0.001). The laser represents a revolution in the field of proctology mainly in the treatment of hemorrhoidal pathology. It is a safe, effective, and less painful mini-invasive technique. More rigorous studies will be needed to better evaluate this technique.

Indexed as

HemorrhoidectomyHemorrhoidsAdolescentAdultAgedHumansLasersMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultHemorrhoidLaser

Identifiers

PMID34331606
OpenAlexW3186847142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.