Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34331566›Full record

ReviewPediatric radiology2022

Neonatal diagnosis of biliary atresia: a practical review and update.

Deborah D Brahee, Brooke S Lampl

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. [Developmental disorders of the gastrointestinal tract].Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  20. Diseases of bile duct in children.World journal of gastroenterology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Deborah D BraheeDepartment of Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave., Mail Code L10, Cleveland, OH, 44193, USA. braheed@ccf.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8778-0446
Brooke S LamplDepartment of Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave., Mail Code L10, Cleveland, OH, 44193, USA.
Cleveland Clinic · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biliary atresia is challenging to diagnose because many of the clinical and imaging features of this condition overlap with those of other causes of cholestasis in newborns. When jaundice persists beyond 2 weeks of age, the neonate should be evaluated for cholestasis, and biliary atresia - the most common cause of neonatal cholestasis - should be considered. It is critical to diagnose biliary atresia early because failure to treat can result in hepatic fibrosis and death in less than 1 year. In this paper, we review the current diagnostic imaging methods, differential considerations and treatment options for biliary atresia.

Indexed as

Biliary AtresiaCholestasisDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansInfantInfant, NewbornBile ductBiliary atresiaCholestasisInfantsMagnetic resonance imagingNeonatesUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID34331566
OpenAlexW3185187177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.