Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34331522›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational allergy2021

Patients with suspected allergic reactions to COVID-19 vaccines can be safely revaccinated after diagnostic work-up.

Trine Holm Rasmussen, Charlotte Gotthard Mortz, Torbjorn Kabel Georgsen, Helene Marlies Rasmussen, Henrik Fomsgaard Kjaer, Carsten Bindslev-Jensen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational allergy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. From Immunogen to COVID-19 vaccines: Prospects for the post-pandemic era.Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. PEG allergy - A COVID-19 pandemic-made problem? A German perspective.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. COVID-19 vaccines and anaphylaxis-evaluation with skin prick testing, basophil activation test and Immunoglobulin E.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Why some people tolerate the second dose of a vaccine but not the first dose.Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology · 2022
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Trine Holm RasmussenDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy Center, Odense Research Centre for Anaphylaxis (ORCA), Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2761-8153
Charlotte Gotthard MortzDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy Center, Odense Research Centre for Anaphylaxis (ORCA), Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8710-0829
Torbjorn Kabel GeorgsenDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy Center, Odense Research Centre for Anaphylaxis (ORCA), Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Helene Marlies RasmussenDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy Center, Odense Research Centre for Anaphylaxis (ORCA), Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Henrik Fomsgaard KjaerDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy Center, Odense Research Centre for Anaphylaxis (ORCA), Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8043-0718
Carsten Bindslev-JensenDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy Center, Odense Research Centre for Anaphylaxis (ORCA), Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8940-038X
Odense University Hospital · DK

Funding

Odense Research Center for Anaphylaxis
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhen initiating the Danish vaccination program against COVID-19, the incidence of anaphylaxis was estimated to be 10 times higher compared to other virus-based vaccines. In this study, we present data on patients referred with suspected allergic reactions to COVID-19 vaccines. The main purpose of the study is to investigate the incidence and severity of the allergic reactions, and to evaluate the safety of revaccination.

methodsAll patients in the region of Southern Denmark with case histories of allergic reactions to COVID-19 vaccines in a defined period are included in this study. Diagnostic work up consisted of a detailed case history, evaluation of Brighton level of diagnostic certainty and World Allergy Organization grade of anaphylaxis and skin prick testing- and basophil histamine release testing with COVID-19 vaccines and relevant drug excipients. Patients were revaccinated at the Allergy Center when possible.

resultsSixty-one patients are included in this study. In 199,377 doses administered, nine patients fulfilled the criteria of anaphylaxis when using the Brighton Criteria (incidence being 45 per million). Of 55 patients with reactions to the first dose, 52 patients were revaccinated without adverse reactions. We found no proven cases of immediate anaphylaxis due to COVID-19 vaccines. By skin prick test, we diagnosed three patients with drug excipient allergy and further a patient with mastocytosis was found.

conclusionsAnaphylactic reactions to COVID-19 vaccines are rare and the incidence is similar to what is seen with other virus-based vaccines. Revaccination is safe in the majority of patients; however, allergological evaluation is important since some prove to have drug excipient allergy.

Indexed as

allergyCOVID-19 vaccinediagnostic testexcipientsrevaccination

Identifiers

PMID34331522
PMCPMC8315275
OpenAlexW3185082152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.