Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34331513›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical materials research. Part A2022

Chitosan/hydroxyapatite nanocomposite scaffolds to modulate osteogenic and inflammatory response.

Alessandra Soriente, Ines Fasolino, Alejandro Gomez-Sánchez, Evgen Prokhorov, Giovanna Giuliana Buonocore, Gabriel Luna-Barcenas, Luigi Ambrosio, Maria Grazia Raucci

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Comparison of different hydroxyapatite composites for bone tissue repair:Iranian journal of basic medical sciences · 2024
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Alessandra SorienteInstitute of Polymers, Composites and Biomaterials-National Research Council of Italy (IPCB-CNR), Naples, Italy.
Ines FasolinoInstitute of Polymers, Composites and Biomaterials-National Research Council of Italy (IPCB-CNR), Naples, Italy.
Alejandro Gomez-SánchezCinvestav-Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Unidad Querétaro, Querétaro, Mexico.
Evgen ProkhorovCinvestav-Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Unidad Querétaro, Querétaro, Mexico.
Giovanna Giuliana BuonocoreInstitute of Polymers, Composites and Biomaterials-National Research Council of Italy (IPCB-CNR), Naples, Italy.
Gabriel Luna-BarcenasCinvestav-Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Unidad Querétaro, Querétaro, Mexico.
Luigi AmbrosioInstitute of Polymers, Composites and Biomaterials-National Research Council of Italy (IPCB-CNR), Naples, Italy.
Maria Grazia RaucciInstitute of Polymers, Composites and Biomaterials-National Research Council of Italy (IPCB-CNR), Naples, Italy.
National Research Council · ITCenter for Research and Advanced Studies of the National Polytechnic Institute · MXInstitute of Polymers, Composites and Biomaterials · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Considerable attention has been given to the use of chitosan (CS)-based materials reinforced with inorganic bioactive signals such as hydroxyapatite (HA) to treat bone defects and tissue loss. It is well known that CS/HA based materials possess minimal foreign body reactions, good biocompatibility, controlled biodegradability and antibacterial property. Herein, the bioactivity of these composite systems was analyzed on in vitro bone cell models for their applications in the field of bone tissue engineering (BTE). The combination of sol-gel approach and freeze-drying technology was used to obtain CS/HA scaffolds with three-dimensional (3D) porous structure suitable for cell in-growth. Specifically, our aim was to investigate the influence of bioactive composite scaffolds on cellular behavior in terms of osteoinductivity and anti-inflammatory effects for treating bone defects. The results obtained have demonstrated that by increasing inorganic component concentration, CS/HA (60 and 70% v/v) scaffolds induced a good biological response in terms of osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSC) towards osteoblast phenotype. Furthermore, the scaffolds with higher concentration of inorganic fillers are able to modulate the production of pro-inflammatory (TGF-β) and anti-inflammatory (IL-4, IL-10) cytokines. Our results highlight the possibility of achieving smart CS/HA based composites able to promote a great osteogenic differentiation of hMSC by increasing the amount of HA nanoparticles used as bioactive inorganic signal. Contemporarily, these materials allow avoiding the induction of a pro-inflammatory response in bone implant site.

Indexed as

ChitosanNanocompositesBiocompatible MaterialsBone RegenerationDurapatiteOsteogenesisTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsBiocompatible MaterialsChitosanDurapatite3D scaffoldsbone regenerationchitosanhydroxyapatitein vitro inflammatory response

Identifiers

PMID34331513
PMCPMC9291049
OpenAlexW3186380954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.