ArticleCancer medicine2021
A clinical variable-based nomogram could predict the survival for advanced NSCLC patients receiving second-line atezolizumab.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveA nomogram model based on clinical variables was conducted to predict the survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving second-line atezolizumab.
methodsFour hundred and twenty-four patients with NSCLC receiving atezolizumab from OAK study were regarded as the training cohort. Next, a nomogram model based on clinical variables in the training cohort was established to predict the survival of patients receiving atezolizumab. The concordance index, area under curve (AUC), and calibration plots were used to assess the performance of the nomogram model. In addition, 144 patients with NSCLC receiving atezolizumab from POPLAR study were regarded as the test cohort to validate the nomogram model. Using Kaplan-Meier and log-rank test, we compared the survival difference between the high- and low-risk groups, atezolizumab and docetaxel treatment groups, respectively.
resultsWe successfully constructed a nomogram model based on different variable scores for predicting the survival in NSCLC patients receiving atezolizumab using the training cohort. According to risk score, patients receiving atezolizumab were divided into the high- and low-risk groups. Importantly, in the training cohort, patients had worse overall survival (OS) in high-risk group compared with the low-risk group (median survival: 252.3 vs. 556.9 days; p < 0.0001). As expected, in the test cohort, the high-risk patients also showed a worse OS (median survival: 288.8 vs. 529.3 days, p = 0.0003). In addition, all the patients from the training and test cohorts could be found the OS benefit from atezolizumab compared with docetaxel (all, p < 0.05).
conclusionsThe clinical variable-based nomogram model could predict the survival benefit for NSCLC patients receiving second-line atezolizumab.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.