Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34331359›Full record

ArticleProteins2021

Protein tertiary structure prediction and refinement using deep learning and Rosetta in CASP14.

Ivan Anishchenko, Minkyung Baek, Hahnbeom Park, Naozumi Hiranuma, David E Kim, Justas Dauparas, Sanaa Mansoor, Ian R Humphreys, David Baker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proteins, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. ProT-VAE: Protein Transformer Variational AutoEncoder for functional protein design.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ivan AnishchenkoDepartment of Biochemistry and Institute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3645-2044
Minkyung BaekDepartment of Biochemistry and Institute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3414-9404
Hahnbeom ParkDepartment of Biochemistry and Institute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Naozumi HiranumaDepartment of Biochemistry and Institute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
David E KimDepartment of Biochemistry and Institute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Justas DauparasDepartment of Biochemistry and Institute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Sanaa MansoorDepartment of Biochemistry and Institute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Ian R HumphreysDepartment of Biochemistry and Institute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
David BakerDepartment of Biochemistry and Institute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.

Funding

High resolution structure modeling with RosettaR01GM092802 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BAKER, DAVID · 2010 to 2017
$2.3M
NIAID NIH HHS HHSN272201700059CNIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM092802
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The trRosetta structure prediction method employs deep learning to generate predicted residue-residue distance and orientation distributions from which 3D models are built. We sought to improve the method by incorporating as inputs (in addition to sequence information) both language model embeddings and template information weighted by sequence similarity to the target. We also developed a refinement pipeline that recombines models generated by template-free and template utilizing versions of trRosetta guided by the DeepAccNet accuracy predictor. Both benchmark tests and CASP results show that the new pipeline is a considerable improvement over the original trRosetta, and it is faster and requires less computing resources, completing the entire modeling process in a median < 3 h in CASP14. Our human group improved results with this pipeline primarily by identifying additional homologous sequences for input into the network. We also used the DeepAccNet accuracy predictor to guide Rosetta high-resolution refinement for submissions in the regular and refinement categories; although performance was quite good on a CASP relative scale, the overall improvements were rather modest in part due to missing inter-domain or inter-chain contacts.

Indexed as

Deep LearningProteinsProtein Structure, TertiarySoftwareComputational BiologyHumansMetagenomeSequence Analysis, ProteinProteinsdeep learningmetagenomesprotein structure predictionrefinementRosetta

Identifiers

PMID34331359
PMCPMC8616808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.