Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34331206›Full record

ArticleNeurocritical care2022

Dynamic Intracranial Pressure Waveform Morphology Predicts Ventriculitis.

Murad Megjhani, Kalijah Terilli, Lakshman Kalasapudi, Justine Chen, John Carlson, Serenity Miller, Neeraj Badjatia, Peter Hu, Angela Velazquez, David J Roh and 6 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurocritical care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Murad MegjhaniDepartment of Neurology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, 177 Fort Washington Ave, 8 Milstein - 300 Center, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7613-6444
Kalijah TerilliDepartment of Neurology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, 177 Fort Washington Ave, 8 Milstein - 300 Center, New York, NY, USA.
Lakshman KalasapudiDepartment of Neurology, Program in Trauma, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Justine ChenDepartment of Neurology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, 177 Fort Washington Ave, 8 Milstein - 300 Center, New York, NY, USA.
John CarlsonDepartment of Neurology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, 177 Fort Washington Ave, 8 Milstein - 300 Center, New York, NY, USA.
Serenity MillerDepartment of Anesthesia, Program in Trauma, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Neeraj BadjatiaDepartment of Neurology, Program in Trauma, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Peter HuDepartment of Anesthesia, Program in Trauma, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Angela VelazquezDepartment of Neurology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, 177 Fort Washington Ave, 8 Milstein - 300 Center, New York, NY, USA.
David J RohDepartment of Neurology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, 177 Fort Washington Ave, 8 Milstein - 300 Center, New York, NY, USA.
Sachin AgarwalDepartment of Neurology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, 177 Fort Washington Ave, 8 Milstein - 300 Center, New York, NY, USA.
Jan ClaassenDepartment of Neurology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, 177 Fort Washington Ave, 8 Milstein - 300 Center, New York, NY, USA.
E S ConnollyNew York Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Xiao HuSchool of Nursing, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Nicholas MorrisDepartment of Neurology, Program in Trauma, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Soojin ParkDepartment of Neurology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, 177 Fort Washington Ave, 8 Milstein - 300 Center, New York, NY, USA. spark@columbia.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-3688-7307
NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · USColumbia University · USColumbia University Irving Medical Center · USDuke University · US

Funding

Machine Learning to Optimize Management of Acute Hydrocephalus PatientsR21NS113055 · NINDS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI PARK, SOOJIN · 2020 to 2020
$446k
NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS113055
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntracranial pressure waveform morphology reflects compliance, which can be decreased by ventriculitis. We investigated whether morphologic analysis of intracranial pressure dynamics predicts the onset of ventriculitis.

methodsVentriculitis was defined as culture or Gram stain positive cerebrospinal fluid, warranting treatment. We developed a pipeline to automatically isolate segments of intracranial pressure waveforms from extraventricular catheters, extract dominant pulses, and obtain morphologically similar groupings. We used a previously validated clinician-supervised active learning paradigm to identify metaclusters of triphasic, single-peak, or artifactual peaks. Metacluster distributions were concatenated with temperature and routine blood laboratory values to create feature vectors. A L2-regularized logistic regression classifier was trained to distinguish patients with ventriculitis from matched controls, and the discriminative performance using area under receiver operating characteristic curve with bootstrapping cross-validation was reported.

resultsFifty-eight patients were included for analysis. Twenty-seven patients with ventriculitis from two centers were identified. Thirty-one patients with catheters but without ventriculitis were selected as matched controls based on age, sex, and primary diagnosis. There were 1590 h of segmented data, including 396,130 dominant pulses in patients with ventriculitis and 557,435 pulses in patients without ventriculitis. There were significant differences in metacluster distribution comparing before culture-positivity versus during culture-positivity (p < 0.001) and after culture-positivity (p < 0.001). The classifier demonstrated good discrimination with median area under receiver operating characteristic 0.70 (interquartile range 0.55-0.80). There were 1.5 true alerts (ventriculitis detected) for every false alert.

conclusionsIntracranial pressure waveform morphology analysis can classify ventriculitis without cerebrospinal fluid sampling.

Indexed as

Cerebral VentriculitisCathetersDrainageHumansIntracranial PressureROC CurveClusteringExternal ventricular drainageICP waveformMachine learningNeurocritical careVentriculitis

Identifiers

PMID34331206
PMCPMC9847350
OpenAlexW3183687159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.