Observational studyNeurocritical care2022
Automated Pupillometry for Assessment of Treatment Success in Nonconvulsive Status Epilepticus.
Observational study in Neurocritical care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Observational
- Application of Pupillometry in Neurocritical Patients.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Review
- Predicting Coma Trajectories: The Impact of Bias and Noise on Shared Decisions.Neurocritical care · 2021Article
- Pupillometry for Diagnosing Nonconvulsive Status Epilepticus and Assessing Treatment Response?Neurocritical care · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAltered pupillary function may reflect nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE). Neurological pupil index (NPi) assessed by automated pupillometry is a surrogate marker of global pupillary function. We aimed to assess NPi changes in relation to NCSE treatment response.
methodsIn this prospective observational study, serial automated pupillometry was performed in 68 NCSE episodes. In accordance with local standards, patients were treated with clonazepam (1-2 mg), levetiracetam (40 mg/kg), and lacosamide (5 mg/kg) in a stepwise approach under continuous electroencephalography monitoring until NCSE was terminated. Patients with refractory NCSE received individualized regimens. NPi was assessed bilaterally before and after each treatment step. For statistical analysis, the lower NPi of both sides (minNPi) was used. Nonparametric testing for matched samples and Cohen's d to estimate effect size were performed. Principal component analysis was applied to assess the contribution of baseline minNPi, age, sex, and NCSE duration to treatment outcome.
resultsIn 97.1% of 68 episodes, NCSE could be terminated; in 16.2%, NCSE was refractory. In 85.3% of episodes, an abnormal baseline minNPi ≤ 4.0 was obtained. After NCSE termination, minNPi increased significantly (p < 0.001). Cohen's d showed a strong effect size of 1.24 (95% confidence interval 0.88-1.61). Baseline minNPi was higher in clonazepam nonresponders vs. responders (p = 0.008), minNPi increased in responders (p < 0.001) but not in nonresponders. NCSE refractivity was associated with normal baseline minNPi (principal component analysis, component 1, 32.6% of variance, r = 0.78), male sex, and longer NCSE duration (component 2, 27.1% of variance, r = 0.62 and r = 0.78, respectively).
conclusionsAutomated pupillometry may be a helpful noninvasive neuromonitoring tool for the assessment of patients with NCSE and response to treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.