Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34331140›Full record

ReviewJournal of experimental orthopaedics2021

Multi-layer cell-free scaffolds for osteochondral defects of the knee: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical evidence.

Angelo Boffa, Luca Solaro, Alberto Poggi, Luca Andriolo, Davide Reale, Alessandro Di Martino

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05332288 (Triphasic Osteochondral Scaffold for the Treatment of Osteochondritis Dissecans of the Knee), which is not on this map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05332288 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Triphasic Osteochondral Scaffold for the Treatment of Osteochondritis Dissecans of the Knee: Observational Study

TypeobservationalSponsorIstituto Ortopedico RizzoliRan2022 to 2029Enrolled30ConditionsOsteochondritis Dissecans Knee
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Recombinant Human Amelogenin Protein Enhances Healing of Osteochondral Injury in a Goat Model.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Recent advances in bionic scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. [Advances in clinical repair techniques for localized knee cartilage lesions].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2024
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Angelo Boffa *Clinica Ortopedica E Traumatologica 2, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via Giulio Cesare Pupilli, 1 - 40136, Bologna, Italy.
Luca Solaro *Clinica Ortopedica E Traumatologica 2, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via Giulio Cesare Pupilli, 1 - 40136, Bologna, Italy.
Alberto PoggiClinica Ortopedica E Traumatologica 2, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via Giulio Cesare Pupilli, 1 - 40136, Bologna, Italy. poggialberto8@gmail.com.
Luca AndrioloClinica Ortopedica E Traumatologica 2, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via Giulio Cesare Pupilli, 1 - 40136, Bologna, Italy.
Davide RealeClinica Ortopedica E Traumatologica 2, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via Giulio Cesare Pupilli, 1 - 40136, Bologna, Italy.
Alessandro Di MartinoClinica Ortopedica E Traumatologica 2, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via Giulio Cesare Pupilli, 1 - 40136, Bologna, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study was to analyze the clinical results provided by multi-layer cell-free scaffolds for the treatment of knee osteochondral defects.

methodsA systematic review was performed on PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane to identify studies evaluating the clinical efficacy of cell-free osteochondral scaffolds for knee lesions. A meta-analysis was performed on articles reporting results of the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Tegner scores. The scores were analyzed as improvement from baseline to 1, 2, and ≥ 3 years of follow-up. The modified Coleman Methodology Score was used to assess the study methodology.

resultsA total of 34 studies (1022 patients) with a mean follow-up of 35 months was included. Only three osteochondral scaffolds have been investigated in clinical trials: while TruFit® has been withdrawn from the market for the questionable results, the analysis of MaioRegen and Agili-C™ provided clinical improvements at 1, 2, and ≥ 3 years of follow-up (all significantly higher than the baseline, p < 0.05), although with a limited recovery of the sport-activity level. A low rate of adverse events and an overall failure rate of 7.0% were observed, but the overall evidence level of the available studies is limited.

conclusionsMulti-layer scaffolds may provide clinical benefits for the treatment of knee osteochondral lesions at short- and mid-term follow-up and with a low number of failures, although the sport-activity level obtained seems to be limited. Further research with high-level studies is needed to confirm the role of multi-layer scaffold for the treatment of knee osteochondral lesions.

Indexed as

CartilageCell-freeKneeMulti-layerOsteochondralScaffold

Identifiers

PMID34331140
PMCPMC8324705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.