ArticleSurgery today2022
Treatment strategies and outcomes for elderly patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus.
Article in Surgery today, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Feasibility and Safety of PD-1 Blockades Among Elderly Patients with Metastatic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Real-World Study.Drug design, development and therapy · 2024Article
- Survival Impacts of Impaired Lung Functions and Comorbidities on Elderly Esophageal Cancer Patients.World journal of surgery · 2023Article
- Preoperative Prognostic Nutritional Index Predict Survival in Patients With Resectable Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Frontiers in nutrition · 2022Article
- The effect of surgery plus chemoradiotherapy on survival of elderly patients with stage Ⅱ-Ⅲ esophageal cancer: a SEER-based demographic analysis.Cancer medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeA multidisciplinary treatment strategy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is required to achieve prolonged survival. We aimed to clarify the differences in treatment strategies for locally advanced ESCC and the outcomes of elderly (aged ≥ 75 years) vs. younger patients (aged < 75 years).
methodsWe compared the treatment strategy selection and the outcomes of 40 elderly and 160 younger patients with cStage II/III ESCC diagnosed between January, 2014 and December, 2016.
resultsNineteen (47.5%) of the elderly patients and 144 (90.0%) of the younger patients underwent esophagectomy and 9 (22.5%) of the elderly patients and 131 (81.9%) of the younger patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Ivor-Lewis or transhiatal esophagectomy was performed more frequently in the elderly group than in the younger group (P = 0.0096). The survival rate after esophagectomy was higher in the younger group than in the elderly group. The overall survival rate of the elderly patients who underwent esophagectomy was significantly higher than that in those who did not.
conclusionsEsophagectomy is a practical choice for elderly patients with locally advanced ESCC, although reduced treatment intensity may impact long-term survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.