ReviewInternational orthopaedics2021
Role of the interosseous membrane in post-traumatic forearm instability: instructional review.
Review in International orthopaedics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Progress in diagnosis and treatment of Essex-Lopresti injury in children.World journal of orthopedics · 2025Review
- Predictors of limited forearm rotation following conservative treatment of distal radius fractures: a retrospective comparative study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2024Article
- Surgical treatment for acute longitudinal radioulnar dissociation with humeral capitellar fracture: A case report.Journal of hand and microsurgery · 2024Article
- Article
- Surgical management of acute combined injuries of the ipsilateral wrist and elbow joints.Annals of translational medicine · 2023Article
- Defining acute Essex-Lopresti injuries is problematic and variable: a systematic review.EFORT open reviews · 2022Review
- Influence of ulnar bow sign on surgical treatment of missed Bado type I Monteggia fracture in children.Scientific reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeIn the last two decades, a strong interest on the interosseous membrane (IOM) has developed.
methodsThe authors present a review of the new concepts regarding the understanding of forearm physiology and pathology, with current trends in the surgical management of these rare and debilitating injuries.
resultsAnatomical and biomechanical studies have clarified the anatomy of forearm constrains and their role in forearm longitudinal and transverse stability. The radial pull test, a new intraoperative test, has been developed that might increase the detection on IOM injuries. The forearm is now considered a "functional unit" and, consequently, a new classification has been proposed. Uncommon variants and rare patterns of forearm fracture dislocations have been reported in the literature and could not be classified to those commonly referred to using eponyms (Monteggia, Galeazzi, Essex-Lopresti). The new Artiaco et al. classification includes all injury patterns, thus avoids confusion in the nomenclature, and helps surgeon with detection of lesions and guiding surgical treatment.
conclusionBased on the new classification and after current literature review, authors propose a management flowchart for treatment of forearm instability injuries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.