Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34331037›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Rheumatology2021

Management of gout in chronic kidney disease: a G-CAN Consensus Statement on the research priorities.

Lisa K Stamp, Hamish Farquhar, Huai Leng Pisaniello, Ana B Vargas-Santos, Mark Fisher, David B Mount, Hyon K Choi, Robert Terkeltaub, Catherine L Hill, Angelo L Gaffo

Open access · hybridAbstract readConsensus StatementReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Rheumatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
9.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Quality Care Assessment in Gout.Current rheumatology reports · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 9 institutions in 4 countries.

Lisa K StampUniversity of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand. Lisa.Stamp@cdhb.health.nz.ORCID 0000-0003-0138-2912
Hamish FarquharUniversity of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-3060-4019
Huai Leng PisanielloDiscipline of Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Ana B Vargas-SantosDepartment of Internal Medicine, Rio de Janeiro State University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5307-0254
Mark FisherHarvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
David B MountRenal Divisions, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0310-2304
Hyon K ChoiDivision of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Robert TerkeltaubVA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, USA.
Catherine L HillDiscipline of Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8289-4922
Angelo L GaffoUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
University of Otago · NZBrigham and Women's Hospital · USHarvard University · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USQueen Elizabeth Hospital · AUThe University of Adelaide · AUUniversidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro · BRUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of California San Diego · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gout and chronic kidney disease (CKD) frequently coexist, but quality evidence to guide gout management in people with CKD is lacking. Use of urate-lowering therapy (ULT) in the context of advanced CKD varies greatly, and professional bodies have issued conflicting recommendations regarding the treatment of gout in people with concomitant CKD. As a result, confusion exists among medical professionals about the appropriate management of people with gout and CKD. This Consensus Statement from the Gout, Hyperuricemia and Crystal-Associated Disease Network (G-CAN) discusses the evidence and/or lack thereof for the management of gout in people with CKD and identifies key areas for research to address the challenges faced in the management of gout and CKD. These discussions, which address areas for research both in general as well as related to specific medications used to treat gout flares or as ULT, are supported by separately published G-CAN systematic literature reviews. This Consensus Statement is not intended as a guideline for the management of gout in CKD; rather, it analyses the available literature on the safety and efficacy of drugs used in gout management to identify important gaps in knowledge and associated areas for research.

Indexed as

GoutGout SuppressantsHyperuricemiaRenal Insufficiency, ChronicBiomedical ResearchHumansGout Suppressants

Identifiers

PMID34331037
PMCPMC8458096
OpenAlexW3185612555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.