Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34331018›Full record

ArticleThe ISME journal2022

Large-scale protein level comparison of Deltaproteobacteria reveals cohesive metabolic groups.

Marguerite V Langwig, Valerie De Anda, Nina Dombrowski, Kiley W Seitz, Ian M Rambo, Chris Greening, Andreas P Teske, Brett J Baker

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ISME journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 60 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
22.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 174 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Sulfonamide resistance geneMicrobiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  10. Diversity of Bacteria.Progress in molecular and subcellular biology · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Key role ofScience advances · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Marguerite V Langwig *Department of Marine Science, University of Texas at Austin, Marine Science Institute, Port Aransas, TX, USA. marguerite.langwig@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0247-2816
Valerie De Anda *Department of Marine Science, University of Texas at Austin, Marine Science Institute, Port Aransas, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9775-0737
Nina DombrowskiDepartment of Marine Science, University of Texas at Austin, Marine Science Institute, Port Aransas, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1917-2577
Kiley W SeitzDepartment of Marine Science, University of Texas at Austin, Marine Science Institute, Port Aransas, TX, USA.
Ian M RamboDepartment of Marine Science, University of Texas at Austin, Marine Science Institute, Port Aransas, TX, USA.
Chris GreeningDepartment of Microbiology, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7616-0594
Andreas P TeskeDepartment of Marine Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3669-5425
Brett J BakerDepartment of Marine Science, University of Texas at Austin, Marine Science Institute, Port Aransas, TX, USA. acidophile@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5971-1021
Istituto di Scienze Marine del Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche · ITDiscovery Institute · USEuropean Molecular Biology Organization · DERoyal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research · NLUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deltaproteobacteria, now proposed to be the phyla Desulfobacterota, Myxococcota, and SAR324, are ubiquitous in marine environments and play essential roles in global carbon, sulfur, and nutrient cycling. Despite their importance, our understanding of these bacteria is biased towards cultured organisms. Here we address this gap by compiling a genomic catalog of 1 792 genomes, including 402 newly reconstructed and characterized metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) from coastal and deep-sea sediments. Phylogenomic analyses reveal that many of these novel MAGs are uncultured representatives of Myxococcota and Desulfobacterota that are understudied. To better characterize Deltaproteobacteria diversity, metabolism, and ecology, we clustered ~1 500 genomes based on the presence/absence patterns of their protein families. Protein content analysis coupled with large-scale metabolic reconstructions separates eight genomic clusters of Deltaproteobacteria with unique metabolic profiles. While these eight clusters largely correspond to phylogeny, there are exceptions where more distantly related organisms appear to have similar ecological roles and closely related organisms have distinct protein content. Our analyses have identified previously unrecognized roles in the cycling of methylamines and denitrification among uncultured Deltaproteobacteria. This new view of Deltaproteobacteria diversity expands our understanding of these dominant bacteria and highlights metabolic abilities across diverse taxa.

Indexed as

DeltaproteobacteriaMetagenomeBacteriaGenomicsHumansPhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID34331018
PMCPMC8692467
OpenAlexW3185283445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.