Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34330909›Full record

ArticleNature communications2021

Memory and decision making interact to shape the value of unchosen options.

Natalie Biderman, Daphna Shohamy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Memory for rewards guides retrieval.Communications psychology · 2024
    Article
  7. Editorial: Memories for the future.Frontiers in psychology · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The role of memory in counterfactual valuation.Journal of experimental psychology. General · 2023
    Article
  13. Counterfactual curiosity: motivated thinking about what might have been.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Why unchosen options linger in our minds.Communications biology · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Natalie BidermanDepartment of Psychology and Mortimer B. Zuckerman Mind, Brain, Behavior Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA. natalie.biderman@columbia.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6691-4188
Daphna ShohamyDepartment of Psychology and Mortimer B. Zuckerman Mind, Brain, Behavior Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA. ds2619@columbia.edu.

Funding

Differentiating reward seeking and loss avoidance with reference-dependent learning modelsR01MH121093 · NIMH · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI DAW, NATHANIEL DOUGLASS, SHOHAMY, DAPHNA · 2019 to 2022
$2.1M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH121093
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The goal of deliberation is to separate between options so that we can commit to one and leave the other behind. However, deliberation can, paradoxically, also form an association in memory between the chosen and unchosen options. Here, we consider this possibility and examine its consequences for how outcomes affect not only the value of the options we chose, but also, by association, the value of options we did not choose. In five experiments (total n = 612), including a preregistered experiment (n = 235), we found that the value assigned to unchosen options is inversely related to their chosen counterparts. Moreover, this inverse relationship was associated with participants' memory of the pairs they chose between. Our findings suggest that deciding between options does not end the competition between them. Deliberation binds choice options together in memory such that the learned value of one can affect the inferred value of the other.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsModels, TheoreticalAdultBayes TheoremChoice BehaviorDecision MakingFemaleHumansLinear ModelsMaleMemoryMotivationPilot ProjectsRewardYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID34330909
PMCPMC8324852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.