ArticleBMJ global health2021
Health expenditures by services and providers for 195 countries, 2000-2017.
Article in BMJ global health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Equity in the allocation of hospital beds in Iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene · 2026Pooled it
- Conquering today's health paradox with the power of HEAL - an expert consensus report plus research priorities and policymaker roadmap.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- The Future Hospital in Global Health Systems: The Future Hospital Within the Healthcare System.The International journal of health planning and management · 2025Review
- The Future Hospital in Global Health Systems: The Future Hospital Within the Healthcare System.The International journal of health planning and management · 2025Review
- Toward a roadmap for addressing today's health dilemma-The 101-statement consensus report.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
- The Economic Impact of Community-Based Allied Health on the Acute Sector: A Systematic Review of Economic Evaluations.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Review
- Grand challenge: addressing the global challenge of healthy aging.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Challenges and recommendations for the translation of biomarkers of aging.Nature aging · 2024Review
- Wearable Sensors for Physiological Condition and Activity Monitoring.Small science · 2024Article
- The Thai Health Promotion Foundation: Two Decades of Joint Contributions to Addressing Noncommunicable Diseases and Creating Healthy Populations.Global health, science and practice · 2024Article
- Is economic growth enough to propel rehabilitation expenditures? An empirical analysis of country panel data and policy implications.BMC public health · 2024Article
- The role of telemedicine towards improved sustainability in healthcare and societal productivity in Turkey.PloS one · 2024Article
- Trends and outcomes in primary health care expenditures in low-income and middle-income countries, 2000-2017.BMJ global health · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionNational Health Accounts are a significant source of health expenditure data, designed to be comprehensive and comparable across countries. However, there is currently no single repository of this data and even when compiled major gaps persist. This research aims to provide policymakers and researchers with a single repository of available national health expenditures by healthcare functions (ie, services) and providers of such services. Leveraging these data within statistical methods, a complete set of detailed health expenditures is estimated.
methodsA methodical compilation and synthesis of all available national health expenditure reports including disaggregation by healthcare functions and providers was conducted. Using these data, a Bayesian multivariate regression analysis was implemented to estimate national-level health expenditures by the cross-classification of functions and providers for 195 countries, from 2000 to 2017.
resultsThis research used 1662 country-years and 110 070 data points of health expenditures from existing National Health Accounts. The most detailed country-year had 52% of the categories of interest reported. Of all health functions, curative care and medical goods were estimated to make up 51.4% (uncertainty interval (UI) 33.2% to 59.4%) and 17.5% (UI 13.0% to 26.9%) of total global health expenditures in 2017, respectively. Three-quarters of the global health expenditures are allocated to three categories of providers: hospital providers (35.4%, UI 30.3% to 38.9%), providers of ambulatory care (25.5%, UI 21.1% to 28.8%) and retailers of medical goods (14.4%, UI 12.4% to 16.3%). As gross domestic product increases, countries spend more on long-term care and less on preventive care.
conclusionDisaggregated estimates of health expenditures are often unavailable and unable to provide policymakers and researchers a holistic understanding of how expenditures are used. This research aggregates reported data and provides a complete time-series of estimates, with uncertainty, of health expenditures by health functions and providers between 2000 and 2017 for 195 countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.