ArticleMicrobiome2021
HumGut: a comprehensive human gut prokaryotic genomes collection filtered by metagenome data.
Article in Microbiome, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
68 citing papers in PubMed, 115 citations in OpenAlex.
- Fecal microbiota transplantation influences microbiota without connection to symptom relief in irritable bowel syndrome patients.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2024Trial
- metaFun: An analysis pipeline for metagenomic big data with fast and unified functional searches.Gut microbes · 2026Article
- Extensive genomic diversity in Desulfovibrio reveals species-specific functional traits associated with disease.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Benchmarking methods for extracting microbial signal from host-dominated metatranscriptomes.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- OAPGC: a high-quality oral and airway prokaryotic genome catalog for enhanced ecological resolution and disease inference.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2026Article
- Harnessing gut microbiome enzymes:Microbiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Fatigue-associated gut bacteria in Japanese healthy adults characterized by metagenomic analysis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Oxford Nanopore Sequencing in pediatric emergency infectious diseases: from rapid diagnosis to precision medicine.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
- VIRGO2: an enhanced gene catalog of the vaginal microbiome provides insights into its functional and ecology complexity.Nature communications · 2025Article
- MeTAline: enabling reproducible and scalable metagenomic analyses.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Article
- Novel cross-feeding human gut microbes metabolizing tryptophan to indole-3-propionate.Gut microbes · 2025Article
- Functional archetypes in the human gut microbiome reveal metabolic diversity, stability, and influence disease-associated signatures.Microbiome · 2025Article
- A genomic atlas of the human gut virome elucidates genetic factors shaping host interactions.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- UPGG: expanding the taxonomic and functional diversity of the pig gut microbiome with an enhanced genome catalog.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2025Article
- Challenges and Opportunities in Analyzing Cancer-Associated Microbiomes.Cancer research · 2025Review
- Smart Microbiomes: How AI Is Revolutionizing Personalized Medicine.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Article
- Deep Learning Transforms Phage-Host Interaction Discovery from Metagenomic Data.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Enzymatic carbon-fluorine bond cleavage by human gut microbes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA major bottleneck in the use of metagenome sequencing for human gut microbiome studies has been the lack of a comprehensive genome collection to be used as a reference database. Several recent efforts have been made to re-construct genomes from human gut metagenome data, resulting in a huge increase in the number of relevant genomes. In this work, we aimed to create a collection of the most prevalent healthy human gut prokaryotic genomes, to be used as a reference database, including both MAGs from the human gut and ordinary RefSeq genomes.
resultsWe screened > 5,700 healthy human gut metagenomes for the containment of > 490,000 publicly available prokaryotic genomes sourced from RefSeq and the recently announced UHGG collection. This resulted in a pool of > 381,000 genomes that were subsequently scored and ranked based on their prevalence in the healthy human metagenomes. The genomes were then clustered at a 97.5% sequence identity resolution, and cluster representatives (30,691 in total) were retained to comprise the HumGut collection. Using the Kraken2 software for classification, we find superior performance in the assignment of metagenomic reads, classifying on average 94.5% of the reads in a metagenome, as opposed to 86% with UHGG and 44% when using standard Kraken2 database. A coarser HumGut collection, consisting of genomes dereplicated at 95% sequence identity-similar to UHGG, classified 88.25% of the reads. HumGut, half the size of standard Kraken2 database and directly comparable to the UHGG size, outperforms them both.
conclusionsThe HumGut collection contains > 30,000 genomes clustered at a 97.5% sequence identity resolution and ranked by human gut prevalence. We demonstrate how metagenomes from IBD-patients map equally well to this collection, indicating this reference is relevant also for studies well outside the metagenome reference set used to obtain HumGut. All data and metadata, as well as helpful code, are available at http://arken.nmbu.no/~larssn/humgut/ . Video Abstract.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.