Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34330259›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2021

Automated classification of clinical trial eligibility criteria text based on ensemble learning and metric learning.

Kun Zeng, Yibin Xu, Ge Lin, Likeng Liang, Tianyong Hao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kun Zeng *School of Data and Computer Science, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Yibin Xu *School of Data and Computer Science, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Ge LinNational Engineering Research Center of Digital Life, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Likeng LiangSchool of Computer Science, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China.
Tianyong HaoSchool of Computer Science, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China. haoty@m.scnu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-9792-3949
Sun Yat-sen University · CNSouth China Normal University · CN

Funding

2019 Guangzhou Innovation and Entrepreneurship Leader Team 20190901008Guangdong Provincial Key R&D Programme 2019B010153001National Natural Science Foundation of China 61772146National Natural Science Foundation of China 9174620National Natural Science Foundation of China U1711266Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province 2021A1515011339
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEligibility criteria are the primary strategy for screening the target participants of a clinical trial. Automated classification of clinical trial eligibility criteria text by using machine learning methods improves recruitment efficiency to reduce the cost of clinical research. However, existing methods suffer from poor classification performance due to the complexity and imbalance of eligibility criteria text data.

methodsAn ensemble learning-based model with metric learning is proposed for eligibility criteria classification. The model integrates a set of pre-trained models including Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT), A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach (RoBERTa), XLNet, Pre-training Text Encoders as Discriminators Rather Than Generators (ELECTRA), and Enhanced Representation through Knowledge Integration (ERNIE). Focal Loss is used as a loss function to address the data imbalance problem. Metric learning is employed to train the embedding of each base model for feature distinguish. Soft Voting is applied to achieve final classification of the ensemble model. The dataset is from the standard evaluation task 3 of 5th China Health Information Processing Conference containing 38,341 eligibility criteria text in 44 categories.

resultsOur ensemble method had an accuracy of 0.8497, a precision of 0.8229, and a recall of 0.8216 on the dataset. The macro F1-score was 0.8169, outperforming state-of-the-art baseline methods by 0.84% improvement on average. In addition, the performance improvement had a p-value of 2.152e-07 with a standard t-test, indicating that our model achieved a significant improvement.

conclusionsA model for classifying eligibility criteria text of clinical trials based on multi-model ensemble learning and metric learning was proposed. The experiments demonstrated that the classification performance was improved by our ensemble model significantly. In addition, metric learning was able to improve word embedding representation and the focal loss reduced the impact of data imbalance to model performance.

Indexed as

Machine LearningChinaHumansClinical trialEligibility criteria classificationEnsemble learningFocal lossMetric learning

Identifiers

PMID34330259
PMCPMC8323220
OpenAlexW3184476827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.