ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2021
Early warning of citric acid overdose and timely adjustment of regional citrate anticoagulation based on machine learning methods.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Enhancing outcomes in pediatric populations with continuous renal replacement therapy: Current multidisciplinary strategies and innovations.Journal of intensive medicine · 2025Review
- Edge computing with federated learning for early detection of citric acid overdose and adjustment of regional citrate anticoagulation.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Predicting quetiapine dose in patients with depression using machine learning techniques based on real-world evidence.Annals of general psychiatry · 2024Article
- Exploring the Potential of Chatbots in Critical Care Nephrology.Medicines (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Clinical assistant decision-making model of tuberculosis based on electronic health records.BioData mining · 2023Article
- A prospective study on serum citrate levels and clinical correlations in patients receiving regional citrate anticoagulation.Clinical kidney journal · 2023Article
- Chinese experts' consensus on the application of intensive care big data.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Can Artificial Intelligence Assist in Delivering Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy?Advances in chronic kidney disease · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRegional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) is an important local anticoagulation method during bedside continuous renal replacement therapy. To improve patient safety and achieve computer assisted dose monitoring and control, we took intensive care units patients into cohort and aiming at developing a data-driven machine learning model to give early warning of citric acid overdose and provide adjustment suggestions on citrate pumping rate and 10% calcium gluconate input rate for RCA treatment.
methodsPatient age, gender, pumped citric acid dose value, 5% NaHCO
resultsFor classifying patients at the early stages of citric acid treatment, the accuracy of neutral networks model is higher than Adaboost, XGBoost and SVM, the F1-score of shallow neutral networks (90.77%) is overall outperformed than other models (88.40%, 82.17% and 88.96% for Adaboost, XGBoost and SVM). Extended experiment and validation were further conducted using the MIMIC-III database, the F1-scores for shallow neutral networks, Adaboost, XGBoost and SVM are 80.00%, 80.46%, 80.37% and 78.90%, the AUCs are 0.8638, 0.8086, 0.8466 and 0.7919 respectively.
conclusionThe results of this study demonstrated the feasibility and performance of machine learning methods for monitoring and adjusting local regional citrate anticoagulation, and further provide decision-making recommendations to clinicians point-of-care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.