Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34330207›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2021

A chromosome-level genome assembly of Cairina moschata and comparative genomic analyses.

Fan Jiang, Yaoxin Jiang, Wenxuan Wang, Changyi Xiao, Ruiyi Lin, Tanghui Xie, Wing-Kin Sung, Shijun Li, Ivan Jakovlić, Jianhai Chen and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Fan JiangHubei Key Laboratory of Agricultural Bioinformatics, College of Informatics, Huazhong Agricultural University, 430070, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
Yaoxin JiangHubei Key Laboratory of Agricultural Bioinformatics, College of Informatics, Huazhong Agricultural University, 430070, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
Wenxuan WangHubei Key Laboratory of Agricultural Bioinformatics, College of Informatics, Huazhong Agricultural University, 430070, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
Changyi XiaoHubei Key Laboratory of Agricultural Bioinformatics, College of Informatics, Huazhong Agricultural University, 430070, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
Ruiyi LinCollege of Animal Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, 350002, Fuzhou, China.
Tanghui XieHubei Key Laboratory of Agricultural Bioinformatics, College of Informatics, Huazhong Agricultural University, 430070, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
Wing-Kin SungHubei Key Laboratory of Agricultural Bioinformatics, College of Informatics, Huazhong Agricultural University, 430070, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
Shijun LiKey Lab of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Education, College of Animal Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, 430070, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
Ivan JakovlićState Key Laboratory of Grassland Agro-Ecosystem, Institute of Innovation Ecology, Lanzhou University, 730000, Lanzhou, China. ivanjakovlic@yahoo.com.
Jianhai ChenInstitutes for Systems Genetics, Frontiers Science Center for Disease-related Molecular Network, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Sichuan, Chengdu, China. jianhaichen@scu.edu.cn.
Xiaoyong DuHubei Key Laboratory of Agricultural Bioinformatics, College of Informatics, Huazhong Agricultural University, 430070, Wuhan, People's Republic of China. duxiaoyong@mail.hzau.edu.cn.
Huazhong Agricultural University · CNFujian Agriculture and Forestry University · CNJilin Agricultural University · CNLanzhou University · CNNational University of Singapore · SGSichuan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Muscovy duck (Cairina moschata) is an economically important duck species, with favourable growth and carcass composition parameters in comparison to other ducks. However, limited genomic resources for Muscovy duck hinder our understanding of its evolution and genetic diversity.

resultsWe combined linked-reads sequencing technology and reference-guided methods for de novo genome assembly. The final draft assembly was 1.12 Gbp with 29 autosomes, one sex chromosome and 4,583 unlocalized scaffolds with an N50 size of 77.35 Mb. Based on universal single-copy orthologues (BUSCO), the draft genome assembly completeness was estimated to be 93.30 %. Genome annotation identified 15,580 genes, with 15,537 (99.72 %) genes annotated in public databases. We conducted comparative genomic analyses and found that species-specific and rapidly expanding gene families (compared to other birds) in Muscovy duck are mainly involved in Calcium signaling, Adrenergic signaling in cardiomyocytes, and GnRH signaling pathways. In comparison to the common domestic duck (Anas platyrhynchos), we identified 104 genes exhibiting strong signals of adaptive evolution (Ka/Ks > 1). Most of these genes were associated with immune defence pathways (e.g. IFNAR1 and TLR5). This is indicative of the existence of differences in the immune responses between the two species. Additionally, we combined divergence and polymorphism data to demonstrate the "faster-Z effect" of chromosome evolution.

conclusionsThe chromosome-level genome assembly of Muscovy duck and comparative genomic analyses provide valuable resources for future molecular ecology studies, as well as the evolutionary arms race between the host and influenza viruses.

Indexed as

DucksGenomicsAnimalsBirdsChromosomesGenomeHumans

Identifiers

PMID34330207
PMCPMC8325232
OpenAlexW3186804421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.