Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34330184›Full record

ArticleGlobal health action2021

Reforms in medical education: lessons learnt from Kyrgyzstan.

Gulzat Orozalieva, Louis Loutan, Aigul Azimova, Anne Baroffio, Olivia Heller, Bruno Lab, Altynai Mambetova, Damira Mambetalieva, Elvira Muratalieva, Mathieu Nendaz and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global health action, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Medical Education in Armenia: An Overview.Journal of medical education and curricular development
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Gulzat OrozalievaFoundation Initiatives in Medical Education, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan.
Louis LoutanDivision of Tropical and Humanitarian Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Aigul AzimovaFoundation Initiatives in Medical Education, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan.
Anne BaroffioUnit of Development and Research in Medical Education (UDREM), University Faculty of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland.
Olivia HellerDivision of Tropical and Humanitarian Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Bruno LabDivision of Tropical and Humanitarian Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Altynai MambetovaFoundation Initiatives in Medical Education, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan.
Damira MambetalievaFoundation Initiatives in Medical Education, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan.
Elvira MuratalievaSwiss Agency for Development and Cooperation, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan.
Mathieu NendazUnit of Development and Research in Medical Education (UDREM), University Faculty of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland.
Georges SavoldelliUnit of Development and Research in Medical Education (UDREM), University Faculty of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland.
Nu V VuUnit of Development and Research in Medical Education (UDREM), University Faculty of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland.
David BeranDivision of Tropical and Humanitarian Medicine, University of Geneva, Faculty of Medicine and Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7229-3920

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human resources are one of the six building blocks of a health system. In order to ensure that these resources are adequately trained to meet the evolving needs of populations, medical education reforms are needed. In Kyrgyzstan, like in many other low- and middle-income countries, human resources for health are a key challenge for the health system in both the quantity and having their training aligned with the health system priorities. Here we present the experience of the Medical Education Reform Project, a project aimed at improving the quality of health professionals through reforming medical education, funded by the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation, as a collaborative effort between partners in Kyrgyzstan and Switzerland since 2013. We used a qualitative study taking a cooperative inquiry approach with an experiential perspective in order to present the implementation of the Medical Education Reform Project in Kyrgyzstan. In order to look at the different components impacting the reform process, a framework comprising: Setting the direction; Building a consensus; Engaging stakeholders; Pilot projects and evaluation; Capacity building; Timing, and Key partners was used to disentangle the lessons learnt. Champions and partnering with key institutions were essential in building consensus, as was the catalytic and facilitating role the project played. This enabled active engagement of a variety of stakeholders in the reform process using different means of interaction ranging from large roundtable discussions, workshops, trainings and even study tours. Pilot projects and research provided tangible actions that could be used to further the reforms. For capacity building, the project offered a wide range of activities that improved clinical competencies, empowered stakeholders, and strengthened organizational capacity. The timing of this reform process in medical education was facilitated by the overall reforms and policies in the health system.

Indexed as

Capacity BuildingEducation, MedicalHealth PersonnelHumansKyrgyzstanWorkforceEducation, medicaleducation, medical, continuingeducation, medical, graduateeducation, medical, undergraduatehealth care reform

Identifiers

PMID34330184
PMCPMC8330711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.