Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34330027›Full record

ArticleWater research2021

Elimination of SARS-CoV-2 along wastewater and sludge treatment processes.

Albert Serra-Compte, Susana González, Marina Arnaldos, Sabrina Berlendis, Sophie Courtois, Jean Francois Loret, Olivier Schlosser, Adela M Yáñez, Elena Soria-Soria, Mariana Fittipaldi and 13 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Water research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Detecting SARS-CoV-2 in sludge samples: A systematic review.The Science of the total environment · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Occurrence of viruses in sewage sludge: A systematic review.The Science of the total environment · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Biological Activated Sludge from Wastewater Treatment Plant before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Albert Serra-CompteCetaqua, Water Technology Centre, Cornellà de Llobregat, Spain. Electronic address: albert.serra@cetaqua.com.
Susana GonzálezCetaqua, Water Technology Centre, Cornellà de Llobregat, Spain.
Marina ArnaldosCetaqua, Water Technology Centre, Cornellà de Llobregat, Spain.
Sabrina BerlendisSuez, Centre International de Recherche sur l'Eau et l'Environnement (CIRSEE), Le Pecq, France.
Sophie CourtoisSuez, Centre International de Recherche sur l'Eau et l'Environnement (CIRSEE), Le Pecq, France.
Jean Francois LoretSuez, Centre International de Recherche sur l'Eau et l'Environnement (CIRSEE), Le Pecq, France.
Olivier SchlosserSuez, Centre International de Recherche sur l'Eau et l'Environnement (CIRSEE), Le Pecq, France.
Adela M YáñezLabaqua, Alicante, Spain.
Elena Soria-SoriaLabaqua, Alicante, Spain.
Mariana FittipaldiLabaqua, Alicante, Spain.
Gemma SaucedoAigües de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Anna Pinar-MéndezAigües de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Miquel ParairaAigües de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Belén GalofréAigües de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Juan M LemaCRETUS Institute, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Sabela BalboaCRETUS Institute, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Miguel Mauricio-IglesiasCRETUS Institute, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Albert BoschUniversity of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Rosa M PintóUniversity of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Isabelle BertrandUniversity of Lorraine Lorraine, CNRS, LCPME, Nancy, France.
Christophe GantzerUniversity of Lorraine Lorraine, CNRS, LCPME, Nancy, France.
Carlos MonteroCetaqua, Water Technology Centre, Cornellà de Llobregat, Spain.
Xavier LitricoSuez Groupe, Paris, France.
Agència de Qualitat i Avaluació Sanitàries de Catalunya · ESCornell University · USSuez (France) · FRUniversidade de Santiago de Compostela · ESCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversitat de Barcelona · ESEngie (France) · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is shed in the feces of infected people. As a consequence, genomic RNA of the virus can be detected in wastewater. Although the presence of viral RNA does not inform on the infectivity of the virus, this presence of genetic material raised the question of the effectiveness of treatment processes in reducing the virus in wastewater and sludge. In this work, treatment lines of 16 wastewater treatment plants were monitored to evaluate the removal of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in raw, processed waters and sludge, from March to May 2020. Viral RNA copies were enumerated using reverse transcriptase quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) in 5 different laboratories. These laboratories participated in proficiency testing scheme and their results demonstrated the reliability and comparability of the results obtained for each one. SARS-CoV-2 RNA was found in 50.5% of the 101 influent wastewater samples characterized. Positive results were detected more frequently in those regions with a COVID-19 incidence higher than 100 cases per 100,000 inhabitants. Wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) significantly reduced the occurrence of virus RNA along the water treatment lines. Secondary treatment effluents showed an occurrence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in 23.3% of the samples and no positive results were found after MBR and chlorination. Non-treated sludge (from primary and secondary treatments) presented a higher occurrence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA than the corresponding water samples, demonstrating the affinity of virus particles for solids. Furthermore, SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected in treated sludge after thickening and anaerobic digestion, whereas viral RNA was completely eliminated from sludge only when thermal hydrolysis was applied. Finally, co-analysis of SARS-CoV-2 and F-specific RNA bacteriophages was done in the same water and sludge samples in order to investigate the potential use of these bacteriophages as indicators of SARS-CoV-2 fate and reduction along the wastewater treatment.

Indexed as

COVID-19WastewaterHumansReproducibility of ResultsRNA, ViralSARS-CoV-2SewageRNA, ViralSewageWastewaterCOVID-19SARS-CoV-2SludgeWastewaterWWTP

Identifiers

PMID34330027
PMCPMC8280618
OpenAlexW3179732296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.