ArticleMedical image analysis2021
An in silico validation framework for quantitative DCE-MRI techniques based on a dynamic digital phantom.
Article in Medical image analysis, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spatial-temporal radiogenomics in predicting neoadjuvant chemotherapy efficacy for breast cancer: a comprehensive review.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Review
- Systematic evaluation of MRI-based characterization of tumor-associated vascular morphology and hemodynamics via a dynamic digital phantom.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2024Article
- Current status in spatiotemporal analysis of contrast-based perfusion MRI.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2024Review
- Towards integration of time-resolved confocal microscopy of a 3D in vitro microfluidic platform with a hybrid multiscale model of tumor angiogenesis.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Quantitative evaluation of an image processing method to perform as designed is central to both its utility and its ability to guide the data acquisition process. Unfortunately, these tasks can be quite challenging due to the difficulty of experimentally obtaining the "ground truth" data to which the output of a given processing method must be compared. One way to address this issue is via "digital phantoms", which are numerical models that provide known biophysical properties of a particular object of interest. In this contribution, we propose an in silico validation framework for dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) acquisition and analysis methods that employs a novel dynamic digital phantom. The phantom provides a spatiotemporally-resolved representation of blood-interstitial flow and contrast agent delivery, where the former is solved by a 1D-3D coupled computational fluid dynamic system, and the latter described by an advection-diffusion equation. Furthermore, we establish a virtual simulator which takes as input the digital phantom, and produces realistic DCE-MRI data with controllable acquisition parameters. We assess the performance of a simulated standard-of-care acquisition (Protocol A) by its ability to generate contrast-enhanced MR images that separate vasculature from surrounding tissue, as measured by the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). We find that the CNR significantly decreases as the spatial resolution (SR
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.