Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34329903›Full record

ArticleMedical image analysis2021

An in silico validation framework for quantitative DCE-MRI techniques based on a dynamic digital phantom.

Chengyue Wu, David A Hormuth, Ty Easley, Victor Eijkhout, Federico Pineda, Gregory S Karczmar, Thomas E Yankeelov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical image analysis, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chengyue WuOden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, 201 E 24th St, Austin, TX 78712, United States. Electronic address: cw35926@utexas.edu.
David A HormuthOden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, 201 E 24th St, Austin, TX 78712, United States; Livestrong Cancer Institutes, United States.
Ty EasleyDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130, United States.
Victor EijkhoutTexas Advanced Computing Center, United States.
Federico PinedaDepartment of Radiology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, United States.
Gregory S KarczmarDepartment of Radiology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, United States.
Thomas E YankeelovOden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, 201 E 24th St, Austin, TX 78712, United States; Livestrong Cancer Institutes, United States; Departments of Biomedical Engineering, United States; Departments of Diagnostic Medicine, United States; Departments of Oncology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, United States; Department of Imaging Physics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, United States.

Funding

VIRAL ONCOLOGY CORE FACILITYP30CA014599 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI CHIEN-MIN KAO · 1985 to 2026
$122.1M
Quantitative MRI for Predicting Response of Breast Cancer to Neoadjuvant TherapyU01CA142565 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI KARCZMAR, GREGORY S., NANDA, RITA · 2010 to 2019
$4.5M
INTEGRATING OMICS AND QUANTITATIVE IMAGING DATA IN CO-CLINICAL TRIALS TO PREDICT TREATMENT RESPONSE IN TRIPLE NEGATIVE BREAST CANCERU24CA226110 · NCI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI LEWIS, MICHAEL T., RUBIN, DANIEL L · 2019 to 2023
$3.2M
Breast Cancer Screening with Quantitative Ultra-Fast DCEMRI and Clinical Risk AssessmentR01CA218700 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI KARCZMAR, GREGORY S. · 2017 to 2021
$3.0M
Image Driven Multi-Scale Modeling to Predict Treatment Response in Breast CancerU01CA174706 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI QUARANTA, VITO, YANKEELOV, THOMAS E · 2013 to 2018
$2.5M
Quantitative DCEMRI of Prostate Cancer Correlation with Gold StandardsR01CA172801 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI KARCZMAR, GREGORY S., OTO, AYTEKIN · 2013 to 2017
$2.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014599NCI NIH HHS R01 CA172801NCI NIH HHS R01 CA218700NCI NIH HHS U01 CA142565NCI NIH HHS U01 CA174706NCI NIH HHS U24 CA226110
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantitative evaluation of an image processing method to perform as designed is central to both its utility and its ability to guide the data acquisition process. Unfortunately, these tasks can be quite challenging due to the difficulty of experimentally obtaining the "ground truth" data to which the output of a given processing method must be compared. One way to address this issue is via "digital phantoms", which are numerical models that provide known biophysical properties of a particular object of interest.  In this contribution, we propose an in silico validation framework for dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) acquisition and analysis methods that employs a novel dynamic digital phantom. The phantom provides a spatiotemporally-resolved representation of blood-interstitial flow and contrast agent delivery, where the former is solved by a 1D-3D coupled computational fluid dynamic system, and the latter described by an advection-diffusion equation. Furthermore, we establish a virtual simulator which takes as input the digital phantom, and produces realistic DCE-MRI data with controllable acquisition parameters. We assess the performance of a simulated standard-of-care acquisition (Protocol A) by its ability to generate contrast-enhanced MR images that separate vasculature from surrounding tissue, as measured by the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). We find that the CNR significantly decreases as the spatial resolution (SR

Indexed as

Contrast MediaMagnetic Resonance ImagingComputer SimulationHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedPhantoms, ImagingContrast MediaComputational fluid dynamicsHemodynamicsKidneyMRI simulatorPharmacokineticsQuantitative MRI

Identifiers

PMID34329903
PMCPMC8453106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.