Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34329361›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

"Not just a hobby, but a lifestyle": Characteristics, preferences and self-perception of individuals with different levels of involvement in birdwatching.

Emilia Janeczko, Adrian Łukowski, Ernest Bielinis, Małgorzata Woźnicka, Krzysztof Janeczko, Natalia Korcz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Emilia JaneczkoDepartment of Forest Utilization, Institute of Forest Sciences, Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-8493-2475
Adrian ŁukowskiDepartment of Silviculture, Faculty of Forestry, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Ernest BielinisDepartment of Forestry and Forest Ecology, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, Poland.
Małgorzata WoźnickaDepartment of Forest Utilization, Institute of Forest Sciences, Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-0237-6488
Krzysztof JaneczkoDepartment of Forest Management Planning, Dendrometry and Forest Economics, Institute of Forest Sciences, Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, Warsaw, Poland.
Natalia KorczDepartment of Natural Foundations of Forestry, Institute of Soil Science and Environment Management, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-3663-0579

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Birdwatching is one of the most sustainable types of nature-based tourism and, at the same time, a form of recreation that is developing very dynamically. Birdwatching is attracting more and more people, not only professionals, but also amateurs from many countries. Birdwatching research is still relatively embryonic, especially when compared to nature tourism or wildlife tourism. Our main aim was to determine preferences and opinions of birdwatchers visiting the largest national park in Poland, in relation to their different levels of involvement. The data were collected in 2018 from a survey of a sample of 357 Polish and foreign birdwatchers. Results showed that birdwatcher respondents were predominantly male, middle-aged, and living in a large city. An important tool described in this article is a new scale that assesses the level of involvement of individual people engaged in birdwatching activity. This scale corresponds well with the individual characteristics of birdwatchers. Most birdwatchers defined their birdwatching activity as a permanent rather than a temporary hobby and therefore considered it to be more of a lifestyle than a hobby. Engagement in birdwatching activity increased with age and frequency of trips. The two most important reasons for birding were 'to be close to nature' and 'fascination with birds'. It has been proven that the development of birdwatching in the future will require a developed infrastructure enabling interaction with the objects of observation.

Indexed as

HobbiesLife StyleSelf ConceptAnimalsBirdsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPoland

Identifiers

PMID34329361
PMCPMC8323953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.