Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34329354›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Deep learning with robustness to missing data: A novel approach to the detection of COVID-19.

Erdi Çallı, Keelin Murphy, Steef Kurstjens, Tijs Samson, Robert Herpers, Henk Smits, Matthieu Rutten, Bram van Ginneken

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Erdi ÇallıDiagnostic Image Analysis Group, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3962-7276
Keelin MurphyDiagnostic Image Analysis Group, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Steef KurstjensLaboratory for Clinical Chemistry and Hematology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.
Tijs SamsonLaboratory for Clinical Chemistry and Hematology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.
Robert HerpersLaboratory for Clinical Chemistry and Hematology, Bernhoven Hospital, Uden, The Netherlands.
Henk SmitsLaboratory for Clinical Chemistry and Hematology, Bernhoven Hospital, Uden, The Netherlands.
Matthieu RuttenDiagnostic Image Analysis Group, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Bram van GinnekenDiagnostic Image Analysis Group, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2028-8972

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the context of the current global pandemic and the limitations of the RT-PCR test, we propose a novel deep learning architecture, DFCN (Denoising Fully Connected Network). Since medical facilities around the world differ enormously in what laboratory tests or chest imaging may be available, DFCN is designed to be robust to missing input data. An ablation study extensively evaluates the performance benefits of the DFCN as well as its robustness to missing inputs. Data from 1088 patients with confirmed RT-PCR results are obtained from two independent medical facilities. The data includes results from 27 laboratory tests and a chest x-ray scored by a deep learning model. Training and test datasets are taken from different medical facilities. Data is made publicly available. The performance of DFCN in predicting the RT-PCR result is compared with 3 related architectures as well as a Random Forest baseline. All models are trained with varying levels of masked input data to encourage robustness to missing inputs. Missing data is simulated at test time by masking inputs randomly. DFCN outperforms all other models with statistical significance using random subsets of input data with 2-27 available inputs. When all 28 inputs are available DFCN obtains an AUC of 0.924, higher than any other model. Furthermore, with clinically meaningful subsets of parameters consisting of just 6 and 7 inputs respectively, DFCN achieves higher AUCs than any other model, with values of 0.909 and 0.919.

Indexed as

COVID-19 Nucleic Acid TestingDatabases, FactualDeep LearningModels, TheoreticalSARS-CoV-2COVID-19HumansRandom Allocation

Identifiers

PMID34329354
PMCPMC8323880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.