Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34329337›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2021

Cellular responses at the application site of a high-density microarray patch delivering an influenza vaccine in a randomized, controlled phase I clinical trial.

Alexandra C I Depelsenaire, Katey Witham, Margaret Veitch, James W Wells, Christopher D Anderson, Jason D Lickliter, Steve Rockman, Jesse Bodle, Peter Treasure, Julian Hickling and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Alexandra C I DepelsenaireVaxxas Pty Ltd, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6743-0097
Katey WithamVaxxas Pty Ltd, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Margaret VeitchThe University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia.
James W WellsThe University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia.
Christopher D AndersonDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linkoping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Jason D LickliterNucleus Network Pty Ltd, Melbourne, Victoria Australia.
Steve RockmanSeqirus Pty Ltd, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Jesse BodleSeqirus Pty Ltd, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Peter TreasurePeter Treasure Statistical Services Ltd, Kings Lynn, United Kingdom.
Julian HicklingWorking in Tandem Ltd, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6178-1953
Germain J P FernandoVaxxas Pty Ltd, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3260-0548
Angus H ForsterVaxxas Pty Ltd, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5363-2015
The University of Queensland · AUVaxxas (Australia) · AULinköping University · SERoyal Statistical Society · GBThe University of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microarray patches (MAPs) have the potential to be a safer, more acceptable, easier to use and more cost-effective method for administration of vaccines when compared to the needle and syringe. Since MAPs deliver vaccine to the dermis and epidermis, a degree of local immune response at the site of application is expected. In a phase 1 clinical trial (ACTRN 12618000112268), the Vaxxas high-density MAP (HD-MAP) was used to deliver a monovalent, split inactivated influenza virus vaccine into the skin. HD-MAP immunisation led to significantly enhanced humoral responses on day 8, 22 and 61 compared with IM injection of a quadrivalent commercial seasonal influenza vaccine (Afluria Quadrivalent®). Here, the aim was to analyse cellular responses to HD-MAPs in the skin of trial subjects, using flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry. HD-MAPs were coated with a split inactivated influenza virus vaccine (A/Singapore/GP1908/2015 [H1N1]), to deliver 5 μg haemagglutinin (HA) per HD-MAP. Three HD-MAPs were applied to the volar forearm (FA) of five healthy volunteers (to achieve the required 15 μg HA dose), whilst five control subjects received three uncoated HD-MAPs (placebo). Local skin response was recorded for over 61 days and haemagglutination inhibition antibody titres (HAI) were assessed on days 1, 4, 8, 22, and 61. Skin biopsies were taken before (day 1), and three days after HD-MAP application (day 4) and analysed by flow-cytometry and immunohistochemistry to compare local immune subset infiltration. HD-MAP vaccination with 15 μg HA resulted in significant HAI antibody titres compared to the placebo group. Application of uncoated placebo HD-MAPs resulted in mild erythema and oedema in most subjects, that resolved by day 4 in 80% of subjects. Active, HA-coated HD-MAP application resulted in stronger erythema responses on day 4, which resolved between days 22-61. Overall, these erythema responses were accompanied by an influx of immune cells in all subjects. Increased cell infiltration of CD3+, CD4+, CD8+ T cells as well as myeloid CD11b+ CD11c+ and non-myeloid CD11b- dendritic cells were observed in all subjects, but more pronounced in active HD-MAP groups. In contrast, CD19+/CD20+ B cell counts remained unchanged. Key limitations include the use of an influenza vaccine, to which the subjects may have had previous exposure. Different results might have been obtained with HD-MAPs inducing a primary immune response. In conclusion, influenza vaccine administered to the forearm (FA) using the HD-MAP was well-tolerated and induced a mild to moderate skin response with lymphocytic infiltrate at the site of application.

Indexed as

Drug Delivery SystemsAdultAntigens, CDCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesFemaleHumansImmunity, CellularInfluenza A Virus, H1N1 SubtypeInfluenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesMaleMiddle AgedSkinTime FactorsAntigens, CDInfluenza Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID34329337
PMCPMC8323919
OpenAlexW3184312365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.