ArticlePloS one2021
Rapid whole-brain electric field mapping in transcranial magnetic stimulation using deep learning.
Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comprehensive evaluation of U-Net based transcranial magnetic stimulation electric field estimations.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Real-time computation of brain E-field for enhanced transcranial magnetic stimulation neuronavigation and optimization.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- A review of algorithms and software for real-time electric field modeling techniques for transcranial magnetic stimulation.Biomedical engineering letters · 2024Review
- Electric Field Modeling in Personalizing Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Interventions.Biological psychiatry · 2024Review
- SlicerTMS: Real-Time Visualization of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Mental Health Treatment.ArXiv · 2024Article
- Non-invasive brain stimulation in cognitive sciences and Alzheimer's disease.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2024Review
- Fast and accurate computational E-field dosimetry for group-level transcranial magnetic stimulation targeting.Computers in biology and medicine · 2023Article
- [The influence of tissue conductivity on the calculation of electric field in the transcranial magnetic stimulation head model].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2023Article
- Computation of transcranial magnetic stimulation electric fields using self-supervised deep learning.NeuroImage · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a non-invasive neurostimulation technique that is increasingly used in the treatment of neuropsychiatric disorders and neuroscience research. Due to the complex structure of the brain and the electrical conductivity variation across subjects, identification of subject-specific brain regions for TMS is important to improve the treatment efficacy and understand the mechanism of treatment response. Numerical computations have been used to estimate the stimulated electric field (E-field) by TMS in brain tissue. But the relative long computation time limits the application of this approach. In this paper, we propose a deep-neural-network based approach to expedite the estimation of whole-brain E-field by using a neural network architecture, named 3D-MSResUnet and multimodal imaging data. The 3D-MSResUnet network integrates the 3D U-net architecture, residual modules and a mechanism to combine multi-scale feature maps. It is trained using a large dataset with finite element method (FEM) based E-field and diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) based anisotropic volume conductivity or anatomical images. The performance of 3D-MSResUnet is evaluated using several evaluation metrics and different combinations of imaging modalities and coils. The experimental results show that the output E-field of 3D-MSResUnet provides reliable estimation of the E-field estimated by the state-of-the-art FEM method with significant reduction in prediction time to about 0.24 second. Thus, this study demonstrates that neural networks are potentially useful tools to accelerate the prediction of E-field for TMS targeting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.